1999Water Science & TechnologyRequires access

A decision support model for the rehabilitation of “non-critical” sewers

Richard Fenner, L Sweeting

Open publisher page 34 citations

Abstract

20% of the UK drainage network is made up of “critical sewers” (those with the highest economic consequences of failure) and in the last 15 years these have been systematically rehabilitated. The remaining 80% of non-critical sewers are dealt with by reactive maintenance only. The paper describes how a flexible and rational decision support model for rehabilitating non-critical sewers has been developed by analysing existing sewer performance data and asset information. The method represents information contained in asset and event databases in a GIS to rank variable sized grid squares into priority zones for action. A second stage uses a Bayesian statistical analysis of each pipe length within those grid squares most at risk from sewer failure. The model has been validated on data from several water company regions and whilst it does not enable an absolute prediction of sewer condition, the procedures help to distinguish those parts of the system in greatest need of attention.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

20% of the UK drainage network is made up of “critical sewers” (those with the highest economic consequences of failure) and in the last 15 years these have been systematically rehabilitated. The remaining 80% of non-critical sewers are dealt with by reactive maintenance only. The paper describes how a flexible and rational decision support model for rehabilitating non-critical sewers has been developed by analysing existing sewer performance data and asset information. The method represents information contained in asset and event databases in a GIS to rank variable sized grid squares into priority zones for action. A second stage uses a Bayesian statistical analysis of each pipe length within those grid squares most at risk from sewer failure. The model has been validated on data from several water company regions and whilst it does not enable an absolute prediction of sewer condition, the procedures help to distinguish those parts of the system in greatest need of attention.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 34 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

20% of the UK drainage network is made up of “critical sewers” (those with the highest economic consequences of failure) and in the last 15 years these have been systematically rehabilitated. The remaining 80% of non-critical sewers are dealt with by reactive maintenance only. The paper describes how a flexible and rational decision support model for rehabilitating non-critical sewers has been developed by analysing existing sewer performance data and asset information. The method represents information contained in asset and event databases in a GIS to rank variable sized grid squares into priority zones for action. A second stage uses a Bayesian statistical analysis of each pipe length within those grid squares most at risk from sewer failure. The model has been validated on data from several water company regions and whilst it does not enable an absolute prediction of sewer condition, the procedures help to distinguish those parts of the system in greatest need of attention.

Key concepts: Sanitary sewer, Rank (graph theory), Asset (computer security), Decision support system, Grid, Bayesian probability, Asset management, Engineering

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A decision support model for the rehabilitation of “non-critical” sewers — Research Paper | ScholarLens