1990British Journal of UrologyRequires access

Treatment of Ureteric Colic. Intravenous versus Rectal Administration of Indomethacin

Ida Bo Nissen, H. BIRKE, Johnny B. Olsen, E. Wurtz, Kristian Lorentzen, Hugo Salomon, P. LYNGE, Pia Fly, Troels Højsgaard Jørgensen, S Svane, Birgitte Nielsen

Open publisher page 24 citations

Abstract

A randomised multicentre clinical trial was undertaken to compare the effect on pain of indomethacin administered either intravenously or rectally to 116 patients with ureteric colic. Adverse reactions were also assessed. Of the patients receiving the intravenous injection, 48/53 (91%) achieved good pain relief (i.e. no supplementary analgesia was required) 30 min after administration, compared with 46/63 (73%) receiving the enema. Significantly more side effects occurred in the group treated intravenously. It was concluded that indomethacin administered as an enema was less effective than the intravenous form, but it should be regarded as a good alternative in the treatment of ureteric colic.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

A randomised multicentre clinical trial was undertaken to compare the effect on pain of indomethacin administered either intravenously or rectally to 116 patients with ureteric colic. Adverse reactions were also assessed. Of the patients receiving the intravenous injection, 48/53 (91%) achieved good pain relief (i.e. no supplementary analgesia was required) 30 min after administration, compared with 46/63 (73%) receiving the enema. Significantly more side effects occurred in the group treated intravenously. It was concluded that indomethacin administered as an enema was less effective than the intravenous form, but it should be regarded as a good alternative in the treatment of ureteric colic.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 24 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

A randomised multicentre clinical trial was undertaken to compare the effect on pain of indomethacin administered either intravenously or rectally to 116 patients with ureteric colic. Adverse reactions were also assessed. Of the patients receiving the intravenous injection, 48/53 (91%) achieved good pain relief (i.e. no supplementary analgesia was required) 30 min after administration, compared with 46/63 (73%) receiving the enema. Significantly more side effects occurred in the group treated intravenously. It was concluded that indomethacin administered as an enema was less effective than the intravenous form, but it should be regarded as a good alternative in the treatment of ureteric colic.

Key concepts: Medicine, Enema, Renal colic, Adverse effect, Anesthesia, Rectal administration, Surgery, Route of administration

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Treatment of Ureteric Colic. Intravenous versus Rectal Administration of Indomethacin — Research Paper | ScholarLens