2000•Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise ScienceOpen access

A Modified Submaximal Cycle Ergometer Test Designed to Predict Treadmill VO2max

James D. George, Pat R. Vehrs, Garth J. Babcock, Michael P. Etchie, Troy D. Chinevere, Gilbert W. Fellingham

Open full text 18 citations

Abstract

This study sought to develop a modified submaximal cycle ergometer test designed to predict maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) obtained on a treadmill. Volunteers (N = 156; women = 80, men = 76) with ages from 18 to 39 years old successfully performed a submaximal cycle protocol on a stationary cycle ergometer and a maximal graded exercise test (GXT) on a treadmill. Open circuit calorimetry was used during the GXT to measure VO2max. Multiple linear regression resulted in the following prediction equation: VO2max = 85.447 + 9.104 χSex (0 = women; 1 = men) - 0.2676 χAge (year) - 0.4150 χBody Mass (kg) + 0.1317 χPower Output (W) - 0.1615 χHeart Rate (bpm), which had acceptable validity (r = .88, standard error of estimate [SEE] = 3.12 ml· kg-1 · min-1). Selected participants (n = 34) performed the submaximal cycle ergometer test twice (within a 5-day period), yielding a test-retest intraclass reliability coefficient of r = .95 for VO2max estimations across days. The reliability of VO2max estimates for women (r = .93) was greater than that for men (r = .74). Cross-validation results were also acceptable using predicted residual sum of squares (PRESS; rPRESS = .87, SEEPRESS = 3.24 ml · kg-1 min-1), which suggests that the new equation should yield acceptable accuracy when it is applied to a similar, but independent sample of adults. In summary, the modified cycle ergometer test developed in this study yields relatively accurate estimates of treadmill VO2max in young adults, requires only a moderate level of exertion, and appears to be a convenient and time-efficient means of estimating cardiorespiratory fitness.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This study sought to develop a modified submaximal cycle ergometer test designed to predict maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) obtained on a treadmill. Volunteers (N = 156; women = 80, men = 76) with ages from 18 to 39 years old successfully performed a submaximal cycle protocol on a stationary cycle ergometer and a maximal graded exercise test (GXT) on a treadmill. Open circuit calorimetry was used during the GXT to measure VO2max. Multiple linear regression resulted in the following prediction equation: VO2max = 85.447 + 9.104 χSex (0 = women; 1 = men) - 0.2676 χAge (year) - 0.4150 χBody Mass (kg) + 0.1317 χPower Output (W) - 0.1615 χHeart Rate (bpm), which had acceptable validity (r = .88, standard error of estimate [SEE] = 3.12 ml· kg-1 · min-1). Selected participants (n = 34) performed the submaximal cycle ergometer test twice (within a 5-day period), yielding a test-retest intraclass reliability coefficient of r = .95 for VO2max estimations across days. The reliability of VO2max estimates for women (r = .93) was greater than that for men (r = .74). Cross-validation results were also acceptable using predicted residual sum of squares (PRESS; rPRESS = .87, SEEPRESS = 3.24 ml · kg-1 min-1), which suggests that the new equation should yield acceptable accuracy when it is applied to a similar, but independent sample of adults. In summary, the modified cycle ergometer test developed in this study yields relatively accurate estimates of treadmill VO2max in young adults, requires only a moderate level of exertion, and appears to be a convenient and time-efficient means of estimating cardiorespiratory fitness.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This study sought to develop a modified submaximal cycle ergometer test designed to predict maximal oxygen consumption (VO2max) obtained on a treadmill. Volunteers (N = 156; women = 80, men = 76) with ages from 18 to 39 years old successfully performed a submaximal cycle protocol on a stationary cycle ergometer and a maximal graded exercise test (GXT) on a treadmill. Open circuit calorimetry was used during the GXT to measure VO2max. Multiple linear regression resulted in the following prediction equation: VO2max = 85.447 + 9.104 χSex (0 = women; 1 = men) - 0.2676 χAge (year) - 0.4150 χBody Mass (kg) + 0.1317 χPower Output (W) - 0.1615 χHeart Rate (bpm), which had acceptable validity (r = .88, standard error of estimate [SEE] = 3.12 ml· kg-1 · min-1). Selected participants (n = 34) performed the submaximal cycle ergometer test twice (within a 5-day period), yielding a test-retest intraclass reliability coefficient of r = .95 for VO2max estimations across days. The reliability of VO2max estimates for women (r = .93) was greater than that for men (r = .74). Cross-validation results were also acceptable using predicted residual sum of squares (PRESS; rPRESS = .87, SEEPRESS = 3.24 ml · kg-1 min-1), which suggests that the new equation should yield acceptable accuracy when it is applied to a similar, but independent sample of adults. In summary, the modified cycle ergometer test developed in this study yields relatively accurate estimates of treadmill VO2max in young adults, requires only a moderate level of exertion, and appears to be a convenient and time-efficient means of estimating cardiorespiratory fitness.

Key concepts: Treadmill, Cycle ergometer, Intraclass correlation, VO2 max, Linear regression, Standard error, Physical therapy, Medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
A Modified Submaximal Cycle Ergometer Test Designed to Predict Treadmill VO2max — Research Paper | ScholarLens