2000Public Works Management & PolicyRequires access

Advocating the Implementation of an Airline Safety Information System

Brent D. Bowen, Chien-tsung Lu

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

Concern for flight safety is at the forefront of attention for airlines, government, and the flying public. But despite the passage of several aviation safety-related bills in the 1990s, the Federal Aviation Administration’s lack of training in airline inspection and reluctance to release safety data has meant that needed airline safety information is still inaccessible to the public. In the aftermath of recent airline tragedies, however, several consumer advocacy groups, investigative commissions, and the popular media have called for an aviation safety ranking system. Such a rating tool would provide both a useful guide and an incentive for an eventual comprehensive system of aviation safety policy. The rating could include rational factors of safety measurements, such as the rate of accidents, rate of fatality, pilot violations, maintenance fraud, financial stability, average age of fleet, and type of enforcement actions (certificate or monetary). And such a rating may provide a model for forecasting airlines at risk as well as a tool for identifying gaps in the architecture of our public aviation infrastructure.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Concern for flight safety is at the forefront of attention for airlines, government, and the flying public. But despite the passage of several aviation safety-related bills in the 1990s, the Federal Aviation Administration’s lack of training in airline inspection and reluctance to release safety data has meant that needed airline safety information is still inaccessible to the public. In the aftermath of recent airline tragedies, however, several consumer advocacy groups, investigative commissions, and the popular media have called for an aviation safety ranking system. Such a rating tool would provide both a useful guide and an incentive for an eventual comprehensive system of aviation safety policy. The rating could include rational factors of safety measurements, such as the rate of accidents, rate of fatality, pilot violations, maintenance fraud, financial stability, average age of fleet, and type of enforcement actions (certificate or monetary). And such a rating may provide a model for forecasting airlines at risk as well as a tool for identifying gaps in the architecture of our public aviation infrastructure.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Concern for flight safety is at the forefront of attention for airlines, government, and the flying public. But despite the passage of several aviation safety-related bills in the 1990s, the Federal Aviation Administration’s lack of training in airline inspection and reluctance to release safety data has meant that needed airline safety information is still inaccessible to the public. In the aftermath of recent airline tragedies, however, several consumer advocacy groups, investigative commissions, and the popular media have called for an aviation safety ranking system. Such a rating tool would provide both a useful guide and an incentive for an eventual comprehensive system of aviation safety policy. The rating could include rational factors of safety measurements, such as the rate of accidents, rate of fatality, pilot violations, maintenance fraud, financial stability, average age of fleet, and type of enforcement actions (certificate or monetary). And such a rating may provide a model for forecasting airlines at risk as well as a tool for identifying gaps in the architecture of our public aviation infrastructure.

Key concepts: Aviation safety, Aviation, Business, Enforcement, Certificate, Government (linguistics), Incentive, Finance

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Advocating the Implementation of an Airline Safety Information System — Research Paper | ScholarLens