Comparison of Dichotomous and Polytomous Item Response Models in Equating Scores from Tests Composed of Testlets
Guemin Lee, Michael J. Kolen, David A. Frisbie, Robert D. Ankenmann
Abstract
Guemin Lee, Michael J. Kolen, David A. Frisbie, Robert D. Ankenmann
Abstract
The performance of two polytomous item response theory models was compared to that of the dichotomous three-parameter logistic model in the context of equating tests composed of testlets. For the polytomous models, testlet scores were used to eliminate the effect of the dependence among within-testlet items. Traditional equating methods were used as criteria for both. The equating methods based on polytomous models were found to produce results that more closely agreed with the results of traditional methods.
OpenAlex reports 39 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
The performance of two polytomous item response theory models was compared to that of the dichotomous three-parameter logistic model in the context of equating tests composed of testlets. For the polytomous models, testlet scores were used to eliminate the effect of the dependence among within-testlet items. Traditional equating methods were used as criteria for both. The equating methods based on polytomous models were found to produce results that more closely agreed with the results of traditional methods.
Key concepts: Equating, Polytomous Rasch model, Item response theory, Context (archaeology), Statistics, Econometrics, Mathematics, Psychology