1994The Journal of GeologyRequires access

Archean Greenstone Belts Are Not Oceanic Crust

M. J. Bickle, E. G. Nisbet, Alexis Martín

Open publisher page 229 citations

Abstract

Archean greenstone belts with a preponderance of mafic volcanic rocks, often preserved in tectonically complex sequences, are obvious candidates in the search for remnants of Archean ocean crust. We review the tectonic setting and stratigraphy of a number of greenstone sequences previously interpreted as Archean ophiolites and conclude, on the basis of basal unconformities, presence of xenocryst zircons, geochemical and isotopic evidence for crustal contamination, intrusive relationships with older basement and their internal stratigraphy, that none of these examples is derived from Archean oceanic crust. Thermal, tectonic, and isostatic constraints imply that Archean oceanic basins did exist and were covered with several kilometers of water. We consider it possible, indeed probable, that relict Archean oceanic crust is preserved in granite-greenstone terrains or other Archean tectonic settings but that an unequivocal Archean ophiolite has not yet been recognized.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Archean greenstone belts with a preponderance of mafic volcanic rocks, often preserved in tectonically complex sequences, are obvious candidates in the search for remnants of Archean ocean crust. We review the tectonic setting and stratigraphy of a number of greenstone sequences previously interpreted as Archean ophiolites and conclude, on the basis of basal unconformities, presence of xenocryst zircons, geochemical and isotopic evidence for crustal contamination, intrusive relationships with older basement and their internal stratigraphy, that none of these examples is derived from Archean oceanic crust. Thermal, tectonic, and isostatic constraints imply that Archean oceanic basins did exist and were covered with several kilometers of water. We consider it possible, indeed probable, that relict Archean oceanic crust is preserved in granite-greenstone terrains or other Archean tectonic settings but that an unequivocal Archean ophiolite has not yet been recognized.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 229 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Archean greenstone belts with a preponderance of mafic volcanic rocks, often preserved in tectonically complex sequences, are obvious candidates in the search for remnants of Archean ocean crust. We review the tectonic setting and stratigraphy of a number of greenstone sequences previously interpreted as Archean ophiolites and conclude, on the basis of basal unconformities, presence of xenocryst zircons, geochemical and isotopic evidence for crustal contamination, intrusive relationships with older basement and their internal stratigraphy, that none of these examples is derived from Archean oceanic crust. Thermal, tectonic, and isostatic constraints imply that Archean oceanic basins did exist and were covered with several kilometers of water. We consider it possible, indeed probable, that relict Archean oceanic crust is preserved in granite-greenstone terrains or other Archean tectonic settings but that an unequivocal Archean ophiolite has not yet been recognized.

Key concepts: Archean, Geology, Greenstone belt, Geochemistry, Oceanic crust, Basement, Crust, Tectonics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Archean Greenstone Belts Are Not Oceanic Crust — Research Paper | ScholarLens