Conventional versus noninvasive ventilation in acute respiratory failure
SH Zaki, Gamal Hamed, A Andraos, Ashraf A. Abd al aziz, Hanan Fawzy, Fatma A. Ragab, S Mokhtar
Abstract
Open-access reader
SH Zaki, Gamal Hamed, A Andraos, Ashraf A. Abd al aziz, Hanan Fawzy, Fatma A. Ragab, S Mokhtar
Abstract
Open-access reader
Treatment of patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) involves mechanical ventilation via endotracheal intubation (INV). Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIV) using the Bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP) can be safe and effective in improving gas exchange. The aim of the study is to assess NIV (BiPAP) as an alternative method for ventilation in ARF and to determine factors that predict the successful use of BiPAP.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Treatment of patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF) involves mechanical ventilation via endotracheal intubation (INV). Noninvasive positive pressure ventilation (NIV) using the Bi-level positive airway pressure (BiPAP) can be safe and effective in improving gas exchange. The aim of the study is to assess NIV (BiPAP) as an alternative method for ventilation in ARF and to determine factors that predict the successful use of BiPAP.
Key concepts: Medicine, Acute respiratory failure, Positive airway pressure, Ventilation (architecture), Noninvasive ventilation, Endotracheal intubation, Non-invasive ventilation, Anesthesia