A Simple Test of Friedman's Permanent Income Hypothesis
Joseph P. DeJuan, John J. Seater
Abstract
Joseph P. DeJuan, John J. Seater
Abstract
Friedman's Permanent Income Hypothesis (PIH) predicts that the income elasticity of consumption should be higher for households for which a large fraction of the variation of their income is permanent than for households facing more transitory variations in income. We test this prediction using modern household data from the US Consumer Expenditure Survey. The results offer some support for the PIH.
OpenAlex reports 23 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Friedman's Permanent Income Hypothesis (PIH) predicts that the income elasticity of consumption should be higher for households for which a large fraction of the variation of their income is permanent than for households facing more transitory variations in income. We test this prediction using modern household data from the US Consumer Expenditure Survey. The results offer some support for the PIH.
Key concepts: Permanent income hypothesis, Economics, Income elasticity of demand, Consumption (sociology), Consumer Expenditure Survey, Test (biology), Econometrics, Labour economics