Auditory adaptation: Some agreement between loudness effects
Ernest M. Weiler, David E. Sandman, Thomas Goldman, James M. Davis
Abstract
Ernest M. Weiler, David E. Sandman, Thomas Goldman, James M. Davis
Abstract
We have not yet found significant intercorrelations between binaural balances, monaural balances, monaural reaction time, and magnitude estimates of loudness adaptation. Despite this, the intracorrelations for each method have been significant and moderately high. Furthermore, for group averages, the characteristics of adaptation measured by the different techniques share similarities such as the progressive decline of loudness over time, even though individuals are not consistent across methods. Recently, using the modified method of magnitude estimates with short intensity increments, we found effects on loudness estimates consistent with the models proposed for binaural balances by Weiler, Loeb, and Alluisi (1972) and Hood and Weiler (1977). Noting that magnitude judgments of loudness should occur at the highest level of the auditory system, perhaps simple magnitude estimates as evolved by Scharf's group include more of the complexities of auditory function than reaction time or balance measures.
OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
We have not yet found significant intercorrelations between binaural balances, monaural balances, monaural reaction time, and magnitude estimates of loudness adaptation. Despite this, the intracorrelations for each method have been significant and moderately high. Furthermore, for group averages, the characteristics of adaptation measured by the different techniques share similarities such as the progressive decline of loudness over time, even though individuals are not consistent across methods. Recently, using the modified method of magnitude estimates with short intensity increments, we found effects on loudness estimates consistent with the models proposed for binaural balances by Weiler, Loeb, and Alluisi (1972) and Hood and Weiler (1977). Noting that magnitude judgments of loudness should occur at the highest level of the auditory system, perhaps simple magnitude estimates as evolved by Scharf's group include more of the complexities of auditory function than reaction time or balance measures.
Key concepts: Loudness, Monaural, Binaural recording, Magnitude (astronomy), Adaptation (eye), Balance (ability), Audiology, Mathematics