1996The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaRequires access

Binaural versus ipsilateral loudness adaptation: A simple relationship after all?

Robert S. Tannen, Ernest M. Weiler, Joel S. Warm, William N. Dember, David E. Sandman

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Weiler and Hood [Audiology 16, 499–506 (1977)] reviewed a model of loudness adaptation proposed by Hood. They found that the model could predict adaptation measured by the traditional simultaneous dichotic loudness balance (SDLB) procedure within a few dB. However, failure to correlate this method with ipsilateral loudness adaptation forestalled attempts to convert the model to monaural/ipsilateral adaptation. The present paper reports success at finding a means of converting the Hood/Weiler model to results from the ipsilateral comparison paradigm. Results from the magnitude estimated ipsilateral procedure appear to be mathematically related in a simple way to adaptation expected from the binaural SDLB procedure. Pertinence of an interpretation based on powers of 2 will be discussed.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Weiler and Hood [Audiology 16, 499–506 (1977)] reviewed a model of loudness adaptation proposed by Hood. They found that the model could predict adaptation measured by the traditional simultaneous dichotic loudness balance (SDLB) procedure within a few dB. However, failure to correlate this method with ipsilateral loudness adaptation forestalled attempts to convert the model to monaural/ipsilateral adaptation. The present paper reports success at finding a means of converting the Hood/Weiler model to results from the ipsilateral comparison paradigm. Results from the magnitude estimated ipsilateral procedure appear to be mathematically related in a simple way to adaptation expected from the binaural SDLB procedure. Pertinence of an interpretation based on powers of 2 will be discussed.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Weiler and Hood [Audiology 16, 499–506 (1977)] reviewed a model of loudness adaptation proposed by Hood. They found that the model could predict adaptation measured by the traditional simultaneous dichotic loudness balance (SDLB) procedure within a few dB. However, failure to correlate this method with ipsilateral loudness adaptation forestalled attempts to convert the model to monaural/ipsilateral adaptation. The present paper reports success at finding a means of converting the Hood/Weiler model to results from the ipsilateral comparison paradigm. Results from the magnitude estimated ipsilateral procedure appear to be mathematically related in a simple way to adaptation expected from the binaural SDLB procedure. Pertinence of an interpretation based on powers of 2 will be discussed.

Key concepts: Binaural recording, Loudness, Monaural, Adaptation (eye), Computer science, Simple (philosophy), Dichotic listening, Magnitude (astronomy)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Binaural versus ipsilateral loudness adaptation: A simple relationship after all? — Research Paper | ScholarLens