2014Anatomy (International Journal of Experimental and Clinical Anatomy)Open access

Comparison of ultrasonography and skinfold measurements of subcutaneous fat thickness in the evaluation of body composition

Şahika Pınar Akyer, Esat Adıgüzel, Nuran Sabir, Ilgaz Akdoğan, Birsen Yılmaz, Gökşin Nilüfer Yonguç

Open full text 10 citations

Abstract

Objectives : To determine the amount of body fat tissue with skinfold thickness measurements is a common method to estimate the body composition. The other method used for this purpose is ultrasonography which is expensive and needs specialization to apply. In this study, validity of skinfold thickness measurements was investigated using ultrasonography. Methods : One hundred adult volunteers (50 males and 50 females) were used in this study. The ages of the subjects were 20 to 70, selected as10 males and 10 females for each decade. Subcutaneous fat thickness of the subjects were measured at seven body sites (submandibula, triceps, biceps, subscapula, suprailiac, thigh and calf) using a skinfold caliper and an ultrasound equipment. The measurements were made by the same person on the right side of the body, while the subject was standing in a upright position. Results : Mean ultrasonographic measurements were smaller than those performed using a skinfold caliper at all areas (p<0.05). Measurements performed with these two techniques were correlated significantly (p<0.001) at submandibular (r= 0.596), subscapular (r=0.692), suprailiac (r=0.706), triceps (r=0.751), biceps (r=0.752), thigh (r=0.802) and calf (r=0.849) areas. Conclusion : The skinfold thickness measurements made using skinfold caliper provides reliable information about the subcutaneous fat tissue.

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Objectives : To determine the amount of body fat tissue with skinfold thickness measurements is a common method to estimate the body composition. The other method used for this purpose is ultrasonography which is expensive and needs specialization to apply. In this study, validity of skinfold thickness measurements was investigated using ultrasonography. Methods : One hundred adult volunteers (50 males and 50 females) were used in this study. The ages of the subjects were 20 to 70, selected as10 males and 10 females for each decade. Subcutaneous fat thickness of the subjects were measured at seven body sites (submandibula, triceps, biceps, subscapula, suprailiac, thigh and calf) using a skinfold caliper and an ultrasound equipment. The measurements were made by the same person on the right side of the body, while the subject was standing in a upright position. Results : Mean ultrasonographic measurements were smaller than those performed using a skinfold caliper at all areas (p<0.05). Measurements performed with these two techniques were correlated significantly (p<0.001) at submandibular (r= 0.596), subscapular (r=0.692), suprailiac (r=0.706), triceps (r=0.751), biceps (r=0.752), thigh (r=0.802) and calf (r=0.849) areas. Conclusion : The skinfold thickness measurements made using skinfold caliper provides reliable information about the subcutaneous fat tissue.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 10 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Objectives : To determine the amount of body fat tissue with skinfold thickness measurements is a common method to estimate the body composition. The other method used for this purpose is ultrasonography which is expensive and needs specialization to apply. In this study, validity of skinfold thickness measurements was investigated using ultrasonography. Methods : One hundred adult volunteers (50 males and 50 females) were used in this study. The ages of the subjects were 20 to 70, selected as10 males and 10 females for each decade. Subcutaneous fat thickness of the subjects were measured at seven body sites (submandibula, triceps, biceps, subscapula, suprailiac, thigh and calf) using a skinfold caliper and an ultrasound equipment. The measurements were made by the same person on the right side of the body, while the subject was standing in a upright position. Results : Mean ultrasonographic measurements were smaller than those performed using a skinfold caliper at all areas (p<0.05). Measurements performed with these two techniques were correlated significantly (p<0.001) at submandibular (r= 0.596), subscapular (r=0.692), suprailiac (r=0.706), triceps (r=0.751), biceps (r=0.752), thigh (r=0.802) and calf (r=0.849) areas. Conclusion : The skinfold thickness measurements made using skinfold caliper provides reliable information about the subcutaneous fat tissue.

Key concepts: Skinfold thickness, Subcutaneous fat, Ultrasonography, Composition (language), Medicine, Body weight, Anatomy, Internal medicine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of ultrasonography and skinfold measurements of subcutaneous fat thickness in the evaluation of body composition — Research Paper | ScholarLens