1985Journal of Geotechnical EngineeringRequires access

Influence of SPT Procedures in Soil Liquefaction Resistance Evaluations

H. Bolton Seed, Kohji Tokimatsu, L. F. Harder, Riley M Chung

Open publisher page 1,337 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to clarify the meaning of the values of standard penetration resistance used in correlations of field observations of soil liquefaction with values of N1 measured in SPT tests. The field data are reinterpreted and plotted in terms of a newly recommended standard, (N1)60, determined in SPT tests where the driving energy in the drill rods is 60% of the theoretical free‐fall energy. Energies associated with different methods of performing SPT tests in different countries and with different equipment are summarized and can readily be used to convert any measured N‐value to the standard (N1)60 value. Liquefaction resistance curves for sands with different (N1)60 values and with different fines contents are proposed. It is believed that these curves are more reliable than previous curves expressed in terms of mean grain size. The results presented are in good accord with recommended practice in Japan and China and should, thus, provide a useful basis for liquefaction evaluations in other parts of the world. Finally, suggestions are made concerning the significance of the term “liquefaction” as it is often used in conjunction with field evidence of this phenomenon.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of this paper is to clarify the meaning of the values of standard penetration resistance used in correlations of field observations of soil liquefaction with values of N1 measured in SPT tests. The field data are reinterpreted and plotted in terms of a newly recommended standard, (N1)60, determined in SPT tests where the driving energy in the drill rods is 60% of the theoretical free‐fall energy. Energies associated with different methods of performing SPT tests in different countries and with different equipment are summarized and can readily be used to convert any measured N‐value to the standard (N1)60 value. Liquefaction resistance curves for sands with different (N1)60 values and with different fines contents are proposed. It is believed that these curves are more reliable than previous curves expressed in terms of mean grain size. The results presented are in good accord with recommended practice in Japan and China and should, thus, provide a useful basis for liquefaction evaluations in other parts of the world. Finally, suggestions are made concerning the significance of the term “liquefaction” as it is often used in conjunction with field evidence of this phenomenon.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1337 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of this paper is to clarify the meaning of the values of standard penetration resistance used in correlations of field observations of soil liquefaction with values of N1 measured in SPT tests. The field data are reinterpreted and plotted in terms of a newly recommended standard, (N1)60, determined in SPT tests where the driving energy in the drill rods is 60% of the theoretical free‐fall energy. Energies associated with different methods of performing SPT tests in different countries and with different equipment are summarized and can readily be used to convert any measured N‐value to the standard (N1)60 value. Liquefaction resistance curves for sands with different (N1)60 values and with different fines contents are proposed. It is believed that these curves are more reliable than previous curves expressed in terms of mean grain size. The results presented are in good accord with recommended practice in Japan and China and should, thus, provide a useful basis for liquefaction evaluations in other parts of the world. Finally, suggestions are made concerning the significance of the term “liquefaction” as it is often used in conjunction with field evidence of this phenomenon.

Key concepts: Liquefaction, Geotechnical engineering, Standard penetration test, Penetration test, Soil liquefaction, Geology, Drill, Environmental science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Influence of SPT Procedures in Soil Liquefaction Resistance Evaluations — Research Paper | ScholarLens