2001Journal of seismology and earthquake engineeringRequires access

Comparison Between Liquefaction Potential EstimatedBased on the SPT and CPT Data in Southern Parts of Iran

Seyed Majdeddin Mir Mohammad Hosseini, H. R. Baktash

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The geotechnical characteristics of the soil layers is one of the main factors influencing liquefaction potential of the ground. The standard penetration test (SPT) had been extensively used to measure the in-situ soil properties due to its simplicity and availability all over the world in the majority of the liquefaction studies. Nevertheless, it suffers from some shortcomings in comparison with another in -situ test called cone penetration test (CPT). In order to compare the liquefaction potentials based on the SPT data with those based on the CPT data, some sites in the southern parts of Iran have been selected and studied. The geotechnical characteristics of these sites have been measured both from SPT and CPT methods, and for the same seismicity condition, the liquefaction potential were estimated using the SPT and CPT based evaluation methods. At the end some correlations were derived between the obtained results and their validities were discussed and justified. Although the correlation factor was found to be very small and the results were highly scattered, it could be concluded that the liquefaction evaluation methods based on the SPT data show more conservative results compared with those based on the CPT data.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The geotechnical characteristics of the soil layers is one of the main factors influencing liquefaction potential of the ground. The standard penetration test (SPT) had been extensively used to measure the in-situ soil properties due to its simplicity and availability all over the world in the majority of the liquefaction studies. Nevertheless, it suffers from some shortcomings in comparison with another in -situ test called cone penetration test (CPT). In order to compare the liquefaction potentials based on the SPT data with those based on the CPT data, some sites in the southern parts of Iran have been selected and studied. The geotechnical characteristics of these sites have been measured both from SPT and CPT methods, and for the same seismicity condition, the liquefaction potential were estimated using the SPT and CPT based evaluation methods. At the end some correlations were derived between the obtained results and their validities were discussed and justified. Although the correlation factor was found to be very small and the results were highly scattered, it could be concluded that the liquefaction evaluation methods based on the SPT data show more conservative results compared with those based on the CPT data.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The geotechnical characteristics of the soil layers is one of the main factors influencing liquefaction potential of the ground. The standard penetration test (SPT) had been extensively used to measure the in-situ soil properties due to its simplicity and availability all over the world in the majority of the liquefaction studies. Nevertheless, it suffers from some shortcomings in comparison with another in -situ test called cone penetration test (CPT). In order to compare the liquefaction potentials based on the SPT data with those based on the CPT data, some sites in the southern parts of Iran have been selected and studied. The geotechnical characteristics of these sites have been measured both from SPT and CPT methods, and for the same seismicity condition, the liquefaction potential were estimated using the SPT and CPT based evaluation methods. At the end some correlations were derived between the obtained results and their validities were discussed and justified. Although the correlation factor was found to be very small and the results were highly scattered, it could be concluded that the liquefaction evaluation methods based on the SPT data show more conservative results compared with those based on the CPT data.

Key concepts: Liquefaction, Cone penetration test, Standard penetration test, Penetration test, Geotechnical engineering, Soil liquefaction, Geology, Subgrade

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison Between Liquefaction Potential EstimatedBased on the SPT and CPT Data in Southern Parts of Iran — Research Paper | ScholarLens