1973Journal of Polymer Science Polymer SymposiaRequires access

Anionic copolymerization of methacrylates

Petr Vlček, D. Doskočilová, J. Trekoval

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

Abstract An investigation was carried out of the anionic copolymerization of methyl methacrylate (M1), 2‐methoxyethyl methacrylate (M2), and 2‐(N, N‐dimethylamino) ethyl methacrylate (M3) in benzene solution at 20°C initiated with lithium tert‐butoxide. The monomer reactivity ratios (M1–M2) r1 = 1.51 ± 0.05, r2 = 2.10 ± 0.10, (M1–M3) r1 = 1.20 ± 0.10, r3 = 0.40 ± 0.05, (M2–M3) r2 = 1.40 ± 0.15, r3 = 0.60 ± 0.15 show that the reactivities of the individual monomers M1, M2, and M3 do not differ too much from each other. A study of the microstructure of copolymers M1–M2 by the NMR method revealed that at low conversions the tacticity of the copolymers depends on the concentration of 2‐methoxyethyl methacrylate in the starting monomer mixture; in the initial stage of copolymerization it is strongly dependent on conversion. Already a low content of M2 in the starting monomer mixture (below 1%) strongly affects the tacticity of the forming copolymer by depressing the content of the isotactic component.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Abstract An investigation was carried out of the anionic copolymerization of methyl methacrylate (M1), 2‐methoxyethyl methacrylate (M2), and 2‐(N, N‐dimethylamino) ethyl methacrylate (M3) in benzene solution at 20°C initiated with lithium tert‐butoxide. The monomer reactivity ratios (M1–M2) r1 = 1.51 ± 0.05, r2 = 2.10 ± 0.10, (M1–M3) r1 = 1.20 ± 0.10, r3 = 0.40 ± 0.05, (M2–M3) r2 = 1.40 ± 0.15, r3 = 0.60 ± 0.15 show that the reactivities of the individual monomers M1, M2, and M3 do not differ too much from each other. A study of the microstructure of copolymers M1–M2 by the NMR method revealed that at low conversions the tacticity of the copolymers depends on the concentration of 2‐methoxyethyl methacrylate in the starting monomer mixture; in the initial stage of copolymerization it is strongly dependent on conversion. Already a low content of M2 in the starting monomer mixture (below 1%) strongly affects the tacticity of the forming copolymer by depressing the content of the isotactic component.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Abstract An investigation was carried out of the anionic copolymerization of methyl methacrylate (M1), 2‐methoxyethyl methacrylate (M2), and 2‐(N, N‐dimethylamino) ethyl methacrylate (M3) in benzene solution at 20°C initiated with lithium tert‐butoxide. The monomer reactivity ratios (M1–M2) r1 = 1.51 ± 0.05, r2 = 2.10 ± 0.10, (M1–M3) r1 = 1.20 ± 0.10, r3 = 0.40 ± 0.05, (M2–M3) r2 = 1.40 ± 0.15, r3 = 0.60 ± 0.15 show that the reactivities of the individual monomers M1, M2, and M3 do not differ too much from each other. A study of the microstructure of copolymers M1–M2 by the NMR method revealed that at low conversions the tacticity of the copolymers depends on the concentration of 2‐methoxyethyl methacrylate in the starting monomer mixture; in the initial stage of copolymerization it is strongly dependent on conversion. Already a low content of M2 in the starting monomer mixture (below 1%) strongly affects the tacticity of the forming copolymer by depressing the content of the isotactic component.

Key concepts: Copolymer, Methacrylate, Tacticity, Monomer, Polymer chemistry, Methyl methacrylate, Reactivity (psychology), Benzene

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Anionic copolymerization of methacrylates — Research Paper | ScholarLens