Ropivacaine-lidocaine versus bupivacaine-lidocaine for retrobulbar anesthesia in cataract surgery
Harvey Siy Uy, Arnel A. de Jesus, Alvin A. Paray, John D.G. Flores, Loreto B. Felizar
Abstract
Harvey Siy Uy, Arnel A. de Jesus, Alvin A. Paray, John D.G. Flores, Loreto B. Felizar
Abstract
PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of ropivacaine mixed with lidocaine and bupivacaine mixed with lidocaine for retrobulbar anesthesia in cataract surgery. SETTING: Philippine General Hospital, Manila, Philippines. METHODS: This prospective double-masked study consisted of 80 patients randomized to receive ropivacaine 1%-lidocaine 2% (Group 1) or bupivacaine 0.5%-lidocaine 2% (Group 2) for retrobulbar anesthesia during extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE). The main outcome measures were frequency of eye pain and amount of globe movement. The degree of pain was scored from 0 to 10 using a visual analog scale. Globe movement in 4 directions of gaze was measured with a ruler. RESULTS: The number of patients with visual analog system scores greater than zero at 5 minutes after infiltration, 10 minutes after infiltration, intraoperatively, and 1, 2, and 4 hours postoperatively was 0, 0, 0, 1, 18, and 29, respectively, in Group 1 and 1, 1, 0, 1, 21, and 33, respectively, in Group 2. The mean globe movement at 5 minutes, 10 minutes after infiltration, and intraoperatively was 5.1 mm, 3.0 mm, and 0.6 mm, respectively, in Group 1 and 4.9 mm, 3.0 mm, and 0.3 mm, respectively, in Group 2. There were no significant differences in frequency of pain and amount of globe movement between the 2 groups at any time. No adverse reactions developed in either group. The duration of surgery was similar between groups. CONCLUSION: Ropivacaine mixed with lidocaine and bupivacaine mixed with lidocaine were equally effective in producing ocular analgesia and akinesia for ECCE.
OpenAlex reports 8 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
PURPOSE: To compare the efficacy of ropivacaine mixed with lidocaine and bupivacaine mixed with lidocaine for retrobulbar anesthesia in cataract surgery. SETTING: Philippine General Hospital, Manila, Philippines. METHODS: This prospective double-masked study consisted of 80 patients randomized to receive ropivacaine 1%-lidocaine 2% (Group 1) or bupivacaine 0.5%-lidocaine 2% (Group 2) for retrobulbar anesthesia during extracapsular cataract extraction (ECCE). The main outcome measures were frequency of eye pain and amount of globe movement. The degree of pain was scored from 0 to 10 using a visual analog scale. Globe movement in 4 directions of gaze was measured with a ruler. RESULTS: The number of patients with visual analog system scores greater than zero at 5 minutes after infiltration, 10 minutes after infiltration, intraoperatively, and 1, 2, and 4 hours postoperatively was 0, 0, 0, 1, 18, and 29, respectively, in Group 1 and 1, 1, 0, 1, 21, and 33, respectively, in Group 2. The mean globe movement at 5 minutes, 10 minutes after infiltration, and intraoperatively was 5.1 mm, 3.0 mm, and 0.6 mm, respectively, in Group 1 and 4.9 mm, 3.0 mm, and 0.3 mm, respectively, in Group 2. There were no significant differences in frequency of pain and amount of globe movement between the 2 groups at any time. No adverse reactions developed in either group. The duration of surgery was similar between groups. CONCLUSION: Ropivacaine mixed with lidocaine and bupivacaine mixed with lidocaine were equally effective in producing ocular analgesia and akinesia for ECCE.
Key concepts: Lidocaine, Medicine, Anesthesia, Ropivacaine, Bupivacaine, Surgery, Cataract surgery, Local anesthesia