2011J Med SciOpen access

Comparison of 0.5% Ropivacaine and 0.5% Bupivacaine for Epidural Anaesthesia in Patients undergoing Lower Abdominal and Lower Extremity Surgery

Mohamad Ommid, Nusrat Jehan, Khairat Mohammad, Shigufta Qazi, Mubasher Ahmad, Raksha Kundal

Open full text 0 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ropivacaine, a derivative of mepivacaine like its older counterpart Bupivacaine, has recently been introduced in Indian pharmacopeia. Ropivacaine is an amide local anaesthetic but less cardiotoxic than bupivacaine.OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical effectiveness of ropivacaine versus bupivacaine in patients undergoing lower extremity and lower abdominal surgeriesMETHODS: 50 patients were randomized to receive 20ml of 0.5% ropivacaine or 0.5% bupivacaine through epidural catheter. Sensory (pinprick) and motor (bromage) measurements were made while the block was in effect, haemodynamic changes; use of additional analgesics and sedatives was noted.RESULTS: The quality and extent of sensory and motor blockade between the two groups was comparable, although bupivacaine was found to be slightly longer acting. Both had similar motor blocking characteristics, with the exception that bupivacaine had a blockade of slightly longer duration but statistically not significant(p>0.05).CONCLUSION: Ropivacaine being lesser cardio toxic is the preferred agent for clinical epidural anaesthesia. JMS 2011;14(1):15-18

Open-access reader

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: Ropivacaine, a derivative of mepivacaine like its older counterpart Bupivacaine, has recently been introduced in Indian pharmacopeia. Ropivacaine is an amide local anaesthetic but less cardiotoxic than bupivacaine.OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical effectiveness of ropivacaine versus bupivacaine in patients undergoing lower extremity and lower abdominal surgeriesMETHODS: 50 patients were randomized to receive 20ml of 0.5% ropivacaine or 0.5% bupivacaine through epidural catheter. Sensory (pinprick) and motor (bromage) measurements were made while the block was in effect, haemodynamic changes; use of additional analgesics and sedatives was noted.RESULTS: The quality and extent of sensory and motor blockade between the two groups was comparable, although bupivacaine was found to be slightly longer acting. Both had similar motor blocking characteristics, with the exception that bupivacaine had a blockade of slightly longer duration but statistically not significant(p>0.05).CONCLUSION: Ropivacaine being lesser cardio toxic is the preferred agent for clinical epidural anaesthesia. JMS 2011;14(1):15-18

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: Ropivacaine, a derivative of mepivacaine like its older counterpart Bupivacaine, has recently been introduced in Indian pharmacopeia. Ropivacaine is an amide local anaesthetic but less cardiotoxic than bupivacaine.OBJECTIVE: To compare the clinical effectiveness of ropivacaine versus bupivacaine in patients undergoing lower extremity and lower abdominal surgeriesMETHODS: 50 patients were randomized to receive 20ml of 0.5% ropivacaine or 0.5% bupivacaine through epidural catheter. Sensory (pinprick) and motor (bromage) measurements were made while the block was in effect, haemodynamic changes; use of additional analgesics and sedatives was noted.RESULTS: The quality and extent of sensory and motor blockade between the two groups was comparable, although bupivacaine was found to be slightly longer acting. Both had similar motor blocking characteristics, with the exception that bupivacaine had a blockade of slightly longer duration but statistically not significant(p>0.05).CONCLUSION: Ropivacaine being lesser cardio toxic is the preferred agent for clinical epidural anaesthesia. JMS 2011;14(1):15-18

Key concepts: Ropivacaine, Medicine, Bupivacaine, Anesthesia, Mepivacaine, Blockade, Local anaesthetic, Motor block

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of 0.5% Ropivacaine and 0.5% Bupivacaine for Epidural Anaesthesia in Patients undergoing Lower Abdominal and Lower Extremity Surgery — Research Paper | ScholarLens