1994•Journal of Bone and Mineral ResearchRequires access

Precision of measurement by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of bone mineral density and content in rat hindlimb in vitro

Harri T. Sievänen, Pekka Kannus, Markku Järvinen

Open publisher page 42 citations

Abstract

Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is a precise and effective method for measuring bone mineral density (BMD) and content (BMC) at various skeletal sites in the human, but its precision for measuring low BMD and BMC in tiny rat bones has scarcely been evaluated. The short-term precision of DXA (Norland XR-26) for eight regions of interest (ROI) was determined by measuring dissected, not totally defleshed hindlimbs from four rats of differently weights 10 times consecutively. The accuracy of the BMD (area) measurement was also evaluated. The following average precision values (coefficients of variation) with negligible reanalysis error were obtained for BMD and BMC measurements: 0.7 and 1.2% (total); 0.9 and 1.2% (femur); 1.3 and 2.8% (tibia); 1.3 and 2.1% (foot); 2.1 and 4.7% (proximal femur); 1.4 and 2.9% (femoral shaft); 1.8 and 5.6% (distal femur); and 2.7 and 7.6% (proximal tibia). As for the accuracy, BMD measured in tiny bones is likely to be markedly underestimated. We conclude that the standard DXA technique without additional modification for small animal measurements is a precise method for BMD and BMC measurements at multiple sites in rat hindlimb in vitro.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is a precise and effective method for measuring bone mineral density (BMD) and content (BMC) at various skeletal sites in the human, but its precision for measuring low BMD and BMC in tiny rat bones has scarcely been evaluated. The short-term precision of DXA (Norland XR-26) for eight regions of interest (ROI) was determined by measuring dissected, not totally defleshed hindlimbs from four rats of differently weights 10 times consecutively. The accuracy of the BMD (area) measurement was also evaluated. The following average precision values (coefficients of variation) with negligible reanalysis error were obtained for BMD and BMC measurements: 0.7 and 1.2% (total); 0.9 and 1.2% (femur); 1.3 and 2.8% (tibia); 1.3 and 2.1% (foot); 2.1 and 4.7% (proximal femur); 1.4 and 2.9% (femoral shaft); 1.8 and 5.6% (distal femur); and 2.7 and 7.6% (proximal tibia). As for the accuracy, BMD measured in tiny bones is likely to be markedly underestimated. We conclude that the standard DXA technique without additional modification for small animal measurements is a precise method for BMD and BMC measurements at multiple sites in rat hindlimb in vitro.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 42 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DXA) is a precise and effective method for measuring bone mineral density (BMD) and content (BMC) at various skeletal sites in the human, but its precision for measuring low BMD and BMC in tiny rat bones has scarcely been evaluated. The short-term precision of DXA (Norland XR-26) for eight regions of interest (ROI) was determined by measuring dissected, not totally defleshed hindlimbs from four rats of differently weights 10 times consecutively. The accuracy of the BMD (area) measurement was also evaluated. The following average precision values (coefficients of variation) with negligible reanalysis error were obtained for BMD and BMC measurements: 0.7 and 1.2% (total); 0.9 and 1.2% (femur); 1.3 and 2.8% (tibia); 1.3 and 2.1% (foot); 2.1 and 4.7% (proximal femur); 1.4 and 2.9% (femoral shaft); 1.8 and 5.6% (distal femur); and 2.7 and 7.6% (proximal tibia). As for the accuracy, BMD measured in tiny bones is likely to be markedly underestimated. We conclude that the standard DXA technique without additional modification for small animal measurements is a precise method for BMD and BMC measurements at multiple sites in rat hindlimb in vitro.

Key concepts: Bone mineral, Femur, Dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, Dual energy, Bone mineral content, Tibia, Coefficient of variation, Hindlimb

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Precision of measurement by dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry of bone mineral density and content in rat hindlimb in vitro — Research Paper | ScholarLens