1995•CirculationRequires access

Effect of Insulin on Acetylcholine-Induced Vasodilation in Normotensive Subjects and Patients With Essential Hypertension

Stefano Taddei, Agostino Virdis, Paola Mattei, Andrea Natali, Ele Ferrannini, Antonio Salvetti

Open publisher page 188 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The present study was designed to directly test the vasodilation action of insulin and its relation to endothelium-dependent mechanisms. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 18 normotensive subjects and 27 patients with untreated mild to moderate essential hypertension, we studied the effect of intrabrachial insulin on the changes in forearm blood flow (strain-gauge plethysmography) induced by intrabrachial acetylcholine (at doses of 0.15, 0.45, 1.5, 4.5, and 15 micrograms.min-1.dL-1), an endothelium-dependent vasodilator, or sodium nitroprusside (at doses of 1, 2, and 4 micrograms.min-1.dL-1), and endothelium-independent vasodilator. Local hyperinsulinemia (deep venous plasma insulin, 48 +/- 6 and 51 +/- 5 microU/mL in control subjects and hypertensive patients, respectively) did not affect basal forearm blood flow and stimulated forearm glucose extraction (control subjects, 3 +/- 1% to 11 +/- 2%, P < .001; hypertensive patients, 3 +/- 1% to 6 +/- 1%, P < .001; P < .01 for the between-group difference). In both normotensive and hypertensive subjects, insulin significantly potentiated acetylcholine-induced vasodilation, whereas it did not alter the vasodilatory response to sodium nitroprusside. NG-monomethyl-L-arginine, an inhibitor of endothelial nitric oxide synthesis, blunted insulin-induced facilitation of acetylcholine vasodilation in normotensive but not in hypertensive subjects. In contrast, in hypertensive patients but not in normotensive control subjects, the potentiation of the vascular response to acetylcholine induced by local hyperinsulinemia was abolished by intrabrachial ouabain, an inhibitor of Na(+)-K+ pump. CONCLUSIONS: In healthy humans and essential hypertensive patients alike, local physiological hyperinsulinemia per se does not increase forearm blood flow but potentiates the vasodilation induced by acetylcholine regardless of metabolic insulin resistance. This effect is endothelium-dependent because it is not seen with nitroprusside and is related to the L-arginine-nitric oxide pathway in normotensive subjects and to smooth muscle cell hyperpolarization in essential hypertensive patients.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: The present study was designed to directly test the vasodilation action of insulin and its relation to endothelium-dependent mechanisms. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 18 normotensive subjects and 27 patients with untreated mild to moderate essential hypertension, we studied the effect of intrabrachial insulin on the changes in forearm blood flow (strain-gauge plethysmography) induced by intrabrachial acetylcholine (at doses of 0.15, 0.45, 1.5, 4.5, and 15 micrograms.min-1.dL-1), an endothelium-dependent vasodilator, or sodium nitroprusside (at doses of 1, 2, and 4 micrograms.min-1.dL-1), and endothelium-independent vasodilator. Local hyperinsulinemia (deep venous plasma insulin, 48 +/- 6 and 51 +/- 5 microU/mL in control subjects and hypertensive patients, respectively) did not affect basal forearm blood flow and stimulated forearm glucose extraction (control subjects, 3 +/- 1% to 11 +/- 2%, P < .001; hypertensive patients, 3 +/- 1% to 6 +/- 1%, P < .001; P < .01 for the between-group difference). In both normotensive and hypertensive subjects, insulin significantly potentiated acetylcholine-induced vasodilation, whereas it did not alter the vasodilatory response to sodium nitroprusside. NG-monomethyl-L-arginine, an inhibitor of endothelial nitric oxide synthesis, blunted insulin-induced facilitation of acetylcholine vasodilation in normotensive but not in hypertensive subjects. In contrast, in hypertensive patients but not in normotensive control subjects, the potentiation of the vascular response to acetylcholine induced by local hyperinsulinemia was abolished by intrabrachial ouabain, an inhibitor of Na(+)-K+ pump. CONCLUSIONS: In healthy humans and essential hypertensive patients alike, local physiological hyperinsulinemia per se does not increase forearm blood flow but potentiates the vasodilation induced by acetylcholine regardless of metabolic insulin resistance. This effect is endothelium-dependent because it is not seen with nitroprusside and is related to the L-arginine-nitric oxide pathway in normotensive subjects and to smooth muscle cell hyperpolarization in essential hypertensive patients.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 188 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: The present study was designed to directly test the vasodilation action of insulin and its relation to endothelium-dependent mechanisms. METHODS AND RESULTS: In 18 normotensive subjects and 27 patients with untreated mild to moderate essential hypertension, we studied the effect of intrabrachial insulin on the changes in forearm blood flow (strain-gauge plethysmography) induced by intrabrachial acetylcholine (at doses of 0.15, 0.45, 1.5, 4.5, and 15 micrograms.min-1.dL-1), an endothelium-dependent vasodilator, or sodium nitroprusside (at doses of 1, 2, and 4 micrograms.min-1.dL-1), and endothelium-independent vasodilator. Local hyperinsulinemia (deep venous plasma insulin, 48 +/- 6 and 51 +/- 5 microU/mL in control subjects and hypertensive patients, respectively) did not affect basal forearm blood flow and stimulated forearm glucose extraction (control subjects, 3 +/- 1% to 11 +/- 2%, P < .001; hypertensive patients, 3 +/- 1% to 6 +/- 1%, P < .001; P < .01 for the between-group difference). In both normotensive and hypertensive subjects, insulin significantly potentiated acetylcholine-induced vasodilation, whereas it did not alter the vasodilatory response to sodium nitroprusside. NG-monomethyl-L-arginine, an inhibitor of endothelial nitric oxide synthesis, blunted insulin-induced facilitation of acetylcholine vasodilation in normotensive but not in hypertensive subjects. In contrast, in hypertensive patients but not in normotensive control subjects, the potentiation of the vascular response to acetylcholine induced by local hyperinsulinemia was abolished by intrabrachial ouabain, an inhibitor of Na(+)-K+ pump. CONCLUSIONS: In healthy humans and essential hypertensive patients alike, local physiological hyperinsulinemia per se does not increase forearm blood flow but potentiates the vasodilation induced by acetylcholine regardless of metabolic insulin resistance. This effect is endothelium-dependent because it is not seen with nitroprusside and is related to the L-arginine-nitric oxide pathway in normotensive subjects and to smooth muscle cell hyperpolarization in essential hypertensive patients.

Key concepts: Medicine, Sodium nitroprusside, Hyperinsulinemia, Internal medicine, Endocrinology, Vasodilation, Insulin, Acetylcholine

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Effect of Insulin on Acetylcholine-Induced Vasodilation in Normotensive Subjects and Patients With Essential Hypertension — Research Paper | ScholarLens