1982The Journal of the Acoustical Society of AmericaRequires access

Frequency selectivity of the monkey’s auditory system: Psychophysical tuning curves

John V. Serafin, D. Branch Moody, William C. Stebbins

Open publisher page 26 citations

Abstract

Frequency selectivity was examined in three monkeys (Macaca nemestrina) by means of psychophysical tuning curves which were obtained under both simultaneous- and forward-masking conditions. The results showed that tuning curves obtained under the two masking conditions were qualitatively similar, sharing many of the same basic properties--sharply tuned tip segments, and greater selectivity at high frequencies than at low frequencies. As measured by Q10dB values, however, the forward-masking tuning curves were more sharply tuned than the simultaneous-masking curves. Additionally, the two procedures resulted in different conclusions regarding how frequency selectivity varies as a function of probe frequency. The simultaneous-masking results suggested that frequency selectivity improves up to at least 16 kHz, the highest frequency tested. The results from forward masking showed frequency selectivity to be greatest in the frequency region of 1-4 kHz. The results are discussed in terms of possible differences between the procedures, and in terms of their relationship to previous studies of psychophysical tuning cures in other species.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Frequency selectivity was examined in three monkeys (Macaca nemestrina) by means of psychophysical tuning curves which were obtained under both simultaneous- and forward-masking conditions. The results showed that tuning curves obtained under the two masking conditions were qualitatively similar, sharing many of the same basic properties--sharply tuned tip segments, and greater selectivity at high frequencies than at low frequencies. As measured by Q10dB values, however, the forward-masking tuning curves were more sharply tuned than the simultaneous-masking curves. Additionally, the two procedures resulted in different conclusions regarding how frequency selectivity varies as a function of probe frequency. The simultaneous-masking results suggested that frequency selectivity improves up to at least 16 kHz, the highest frequency tested. The results from forward masking showed frequency selectivity to be greatest in the frequency region of 1-4 kHz. The results are discussed in terms of possible differences between the procedures, and in terms of their relationship to previous studies of psychophysical tuning cures in other species.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 26 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Frequency selectivity was examined in three monkeys (Macaca nemestrina) by means of psychophysical tuning curves which were obtained under both simultaneous- and forward-masking conditions. The results showed that tuning curves obtained under the two masking conditions were qualitatively similar, sharing many of the same basic properties--sharply tuned tip segments, and greater selectivity at high frequencies than at low frequencies. As measured by Q10dB values, however, the forward-masking tuning curves were more sharply tuned than the simultaneous-masking curves. Additionally, the two procedures resulted in different conclusions regarding how frequency selectivity varies as a function of probe frequency. The simultaneous-masking results suggested that frequency selectivity improves up to at least 16 kHz, the highest frequency tested. The results from forward masking showed frequency selectivity to be greatest in the frequency region of 1-4 kHz. The results are discussed in terms of possible differences between the procedures, and in terms of their relationship to previous studies of psychophysical tuning cures in other species.

Key concepts: Frequency selectivity, Masking (illustration), Selectivity, Auditory masking, Acoustics, Psychoacoustics, Materials science, Physics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Frequency selectivity of the monkey’s auditory system: Psychophysical tuning curves — Research Paper | ScholarLens