2014DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)Requires access

Assessment of frequency selectivity with psychoacoustic masking curves

Tomasz Łętowski, Anna K. Nábělek

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Psychophysical tuning curves (PTCs) and narrow-band masking curves (NMCs) were obtained for three frequencies: 500, 1600, and 2500 Hz, using the Bekesy tracking method. Comparisons of the data obtained for seven normal and one slightly impaired ears indicate that PTCs measured at 20 dB SL and NMCs measured at 40 dB SL seem to be equally effective in describing frequency selectivity using Q(10) criterion. Therefore, the choice of either methodology for assessment of frequency resolution may be dictated by its convenience and avilable instrumentation. Due to dependence of PTCs and NMCs on signal presentation level, the conclusions of this study are limited to normally hearing listeners. It is yet to be shown whether and within what range of hearing loss both measures can be treated as equivalent at higher presentation level.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Psychophysical tuning curves (PTCs) and narrow-band masking curves (NMCs) were obtained for three frequencies: 500, 1600, and 2500 Hz, using the Bekesy tracking method. Comparisons of the data obtained for seven normal and one slightly impaired ears indicate that PTCs measured at 20 dB SL and NMCs measured at 40 dB SL seem to be equally effective in describing frequency selectivity using Q(10) criterion. Therefore, the choice of either methodology for assessment of frequency resolution may be dictated by its convenience and avilable instrumentation. Due to dependence of PTCs and NMCs on signal presentation level, the conclusions of this study are limited to normally hearing listeners. It is yet to be shown whether and within what range of hearing loss both measures can be treated as equivalent at higher presentation level.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Psychophysical tuning curves (PTCs) and narrow-band masking curves (NMCs) were obtained for three frequencies: 500, 1600, and 2500 Hz, using the Bekesy tracking method. Comparisons of the data obtained for seven normal and one slightly impaired ears indicate that PTCs measured at 20 dB SL and NMCs measured at 40 dB SL seem to be equally effective in describing frequency selectivity using Q(10) criterion. Therefore, the choice of either methodology for assessment of frequency resolution may be dictated by its convenience and avilable instrumentation. Due to dependence of PTCs and NMCs on signal presentation level, the conclusions of this study are limited to normally hearing listeners. It is yet to be shown whether and within what range of hearing loss both measures can be treated as equivalent at higher presentation level.

Key concepts: Psychoacoustics, Frequency selectivity, Masking (illustration), Critical band, Acoustics, Instrumentation (computer programming), Computer science, Presentation (obstetrics)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Assessment of frequency selectivity with psychoacoustic masking curves — Research Paper | ScholarLens