1999Quality Assurance in EducationRequires access

Quality assurance systems and educational development: part 1 ‐ the limitations of quality control

Jan McKay, David Kember

Open publisher page 27 citations

Abstract

This is the first of two related articles examining the trend towards initiatives to ensure quality in teaching which has led to an increased emphasis on quality assurance or control measures which ensure that teaching and learning reach some minimum acceptable level. This first part presents a case study where a quality assurance mechanism, in the form of programme validation procedure, prevented the offering of a poorly developed degree proposal. It concludes with the understanding that quality assurance measures were crucial in providing the window of opportunity for the subsequent development of a radically different second proposal. The quality assurance measures could not, however, be responsible for the transformation that happened. The quality enhancement initiatives that occurred as a result of the opportunity provided by the quality assurance mechanism are the focus of the second paper.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This is the first of two related articles examining the trend towards initiatives to ensure quality in teaching which has led to an increased emphasis on quality assurance or control measures which ensure that teaching and learning reach some minimum acceptable level. This first part presents a case study where a quality assurance mechanism, in the form of programme validation procedure, prevented the offering of a poorly developed degree proposal. It concludes with the understanding that quality assurance measures were crucial in providing the window of opportunity for the subsequent development of a radically different second proposal. The quality assurance measures could not, however, be responsible for the transformation that happened. The quality enhancement initiatives that occurred as a result of the opportunity provided by the quality assurance mechanism are the focus of the second paper.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 27 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This is the first of two related articles examining the trend towards initiatives to ensure quality in teaching which has led to an increased emphasis on quality assurance or control measures which ensure that teaching and learning reach some minimum acceptable level. This first part presents a case study where a quality assurance mechanism, in the form of programme validation procedure, prevented the offering of a poorly developed degree proposal. It concludes with the understanding that quality assurance measures were crucial in providing the window of opportunity for the subsequent development of a radically different second proposal. The quality assurance measures could not, however, be responsible for the transformation that happened. The quality enhancement initiatives that occurred as a result of the opportunity provided by the quality assurance mechanism are the focus of the second paper.

Key concepts: Quality assurance, Quality (philosophy), Control (management), Process management, Business, Higher education, Engineering management, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Quality assurance systems and educational development: part 1 ‐ the limitations of quality control — Research Paper | ScholarLens