1995PubMedRequires access

[Quality assurance from the theoretical viewpoint].

Christian Ohmann

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

The process of quality assurance is related to all measures and actions used to achieve the required quality. There is agreement about the aim and benefit of quality assurance, but the appropriate way is a matter of discussion. This paper deals from a theoretical viewpoint with basic problems of quality assurance that have not been evaluated adequately so far: a) criteria for measuring quality, b) measuring quality with adjustment for case-mix and c) evaluation of the effects of quality assurance. During the last years tools and study designs have been developed, which could contribute to the solution of these problems by a more sensible analysis, more complete and quality-controlled data and more useful evaluation studies. Further improvements in external quality assurance in surgery are to be expected, if these aspects are taken into consideration.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The process of quality assurance is related to all measures and actions used to achieve the required quality. There is agreement about the aim and benefit of quality assurance, but the appropriate way is a matter of discussion. This paper deals from a theoretical viewpoint with basic problems of quality assurance that have not been evaluated adequately so far: a) criteria for measuring quality, b) measuring quality with adjustment for case-mix and c) evaluation of the effects of quality assurance. During the last years tools and study designs have been developed, which could contribute to the solution of these problems by a more sensible analysis, more complete and quality-controlled data and more useful evaluation studies. Further improvements in external quality assurance in surgery are to be expected, if these aspects are taken into consideration.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The process of quality assurance is related to all measures and actions used to achieve the required quality. There is agreement about the aim and benefit of quality assurance, but the appropriate way is a matter of discussion. This paper deals from a theoretical viewpoint with basic problems of quality assurance that have not been evaluated adequately so far: a) criteria for measuring quality, b) measuring quality with adjustment for case-mix and c) evaluation of the effects of quality assurance. During the last years tools and study designs have been developed, which could contribute to the solution of these problems by a more sensible analysis, more complete and quality-controlled data and more useful evaluation studies. Further improvements in external quality assurance in surgery are to be expected, if these aspects are taken into consideration.

Key concepts: Quality assurance, Quality (philosophy), QA/QC, Risk analysis (engineering), Process (computing), Computer science, Program assurance, Software quality control

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
[Quality assurance from the theoretical viewpoint]. — Research Paper | ScholarLens