2000PracticeRequires access

It's a matter of choice: Making direct payments work in Staffordshire

Janet Leece

Open publisher page 18 citations

Abstract

This article examines the responses and experiences of service users to evaluate one social services direct payments project. It brings together research findings from other schemes to raise important considerations for practice in the operation of direct payment schemes around the country, whilst revealing some features unique to the Staffordshire scheme. It also has some relevance for policy making. The study highlights the many challenges to direct payment schemes: increasing the take up rate, ensuring all groups are included, making all disabled people aware of the direct payment option, the difficulties in recruitment of personal assistants, enthusing and training social workers and so on. The article makes suggestions for improvements in practice to ensure greater numbers and diversity of disabled people can enjoy the many benefits of direct payments.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

This article examines the responses and experiences of service users to evaluate one social services direct payments project. It brings together research findings from other schemes to raise important considerations for practice in the operation of direct payment schemes around the country, whilst revealing some features unique to the Staffordshire scheme. It also has some relevance for policy making. The study highlights the many challenges to direct payment schemes: increasing the take up rate, ensuring all groups are included, making all disabled people aware of the direct payment option, the difficulties in recruitment of personal assistants, enthusing and training social workers and so on. The article makes suggestions for improvements in practice to ensure greater numbers and diversity of disabled people can enjoy the many benefits of direct payments.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

This article examines the responses and experiences of service users to evaluate one social services direct payments project. It brings together research findings from other schemes to raise important considerations for practice in the operation of direct payment schemes around the country, whilst revealing some features unique to the Staffordshire scheme. It also has some relevance for policy making. The study highlights the many challenges to direct payment schemes: increasing the take up rate, ensuring all groups are included, making all disabled people aware of the direct payment option, the difficulties in recruitment of personal assistants, enthusing and training social workers and so on. The article makes suggestions for improvements in practice to ensure greater numbers and diversity of disabled people can enjoy the many benefits of direct payments.

Key concepts: Direct Payments, Payment, Diversity (politics), Work (physics), Business, Relevance (law), Social work, Service (business)

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
It's a matter of choice: Making direct payments work in Staffordshire — Research Paper | ScholarLens