Large‐scale integrative facilities in tribal societies: Cross‐cultural and southwestern US examples
Michael A. Adler, Richard H. Wilshusen
Abstract
Michael A. Adler, Richard H. Wilshusen
Abstract
This paper combines both ethnographic and archaeological data in an examination of the construction and use of monumental architecture in formative cultures. We propose that our current archaeological interpretations of the evolution and function of large‐scale social integrative facilities, i.e. monuments, should be informed by a broader understanding of the organizational role played by social integrative facilities in modern as well as prehistoric societies. With this information it is possible to re‐examine the massive prehistoric structures known as ‘great kivas’ in the American southwest. The construction and use of early great kivas are proposed to be most similar to the large‐scale, specialized ritual facilities documented in the ethnographic record.
OpenAlex reports 115 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
This paper combines both ethnographic and archaeological data in an examination of the construction and use of monumental architecture in formative cultures. We propose that our current archaeological interpretations of the evolution and function of large‐scale social integrative facilities, i.e. monuments, should be informed by a broader understanding of the organizational role played by social integrative facilities in modern as well as prehistoric societies. With this information it is possible to re‐examine the massive prehistoric structures known as ‘great kivas’ in the American southwest. The construction and use of early great kivas are proposed to be most similar to the large‐scale, specialized ritual facilities documented in the ethnographic record.
Key concepts: Prehistory, Ethnography, Formative assessment, Scale (ratio), Anthropology, Function (biology), Archaeology, Archaeological record