1989Survey of AnesthesiologyRequires access

Comparative Pharmacokinetics of Bupivacaine and Ropivacaine, a New Amide Local Anesthetic

G. Richard Arthur, Hal S. Feldman, Benjamín G. Covino

Open publisher page 94 citations

Abstract

The pharmacokinetics of ropivacaine, a new amide local anesthetic, and bupivacaine were determined in dogs after IV and epidural administration. After 15-minute IV infusions of 3.0 mg/kg ropivacaine (n = 6) and 3.4 mg/kg bupivacaine (n = 4), the maximum arterial concentrations (Cmax) of ropivacaine averaged 2.41 +/- 0.52 micrograms/ml compared with 3.35 +/- 0.16 micrograms/ml of bupivacaine. The elimination half life (t 1/2 beta) of ropivacaine (25.9 +/- 1.7 min) was significantly shorter than for bupivacaine (39.1 +/- 13.3 min) after IV infusion. This was reflected by mean clearance values (Cl) for ropivacaine of 41.1 +/- 8.2 ml.min-1.kg-1 compared with 32.3 +/- 4.8 ml.min-1.kg-1 for bupivacaine, although the difference was not statistically significant. After epidural injections (ropivacaine n = 6; bupivacaine n = 5), a dose-related increase in Cmax was observed with both drugs. Although Cmax tended to be higher for ropivacaine, a significant difference was only attained when comparing Cmax after administration of 0.25% plain solutions of both agents. The addition of epinephrine did not consistently decrease the Cmax of either agent. The apparent t 1/2 beta of both agents was significantly longer after epidural administration than after IV infusion. No differences existed between t 1/2 beta values for ropivacaine and bupivacaine after epidural administration. Total body clearance of both agents tended to be lower after epidural administration, particularly when epinephrine-containing solutions were employed. Little difference existed between the two drugs when equivalent solutions were administered.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The pharmacokinetics of ropivacaine, a new amide local anesthetic, and bupivacaine were determined in dogs after IV and epidural administration. After 15-minute IV infusions of 3.0 mg/kg ropivacaine (n = 6) and 3.4 mg/kg bupivacaine (n = 4), the maximum arterial concentrations (Cmax) of ropivacaine averaged 2.41 +/- 0.52 micrograms/ml compared with 3.35 +/- 0.16 micrograms/ml of bupivacaine. The elimination half life (t 1/2 beta) of ropivacaine (25.9 +/- 1.7 min) was significantly shorter than for bupivacaine (39.1 +/- 13.3 min) after IV infusion. This was reflected by mean clearance values (Cl) for ropivacaine of 41.1 +/- 8.2 ml.min-1.kg-1 compared with 32.3 +/- 4.8 ml.min-1.kg-1 for bupivacaine, although the difference was not statistically significant. After epidural injections (ropivacaine n = 6; bupivacaine n = 5), a dose-related increase in Cmax was observed with both drugs. Although Cmax tended to be higher for ropivacaine, a significant difference was only attained when comparing Cmax after administration of 0.25% plain solutions of both agents. The addition of epinephrine did not consistently decrease the Cmax of either agent. The apparent t 1/2 beta of both agents was significantly longer after epidural administration than after IV infusion. No differences existed between t 1/2 beta values for ropivacaine and bupivacaine after epidural administration. Total body clearance of both agents tended to be lower after epidural administration, particularly when epinephrine-containing solutions were employed. Little difference existed between the two drugs when equivalent solutions were administered.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 94 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The pharmacokinetics of ropivacaine, a new amide local anesthetic, and bupivacaine were determined in dogs after IV and epidural administration. After 15-minute IV infusions of 3.0 mg/kg ropivacaine (n = 6) and 3.4 mg/kg bupivacaine (n = 4), the maximum arterial concentrations (Cmax) of ropivacaine averaged 2.41 +/- 0.52 micrograms/ml compared with 3.35 +/- 0.16 micrograms/ml of bupivacaine. The elimination half life (t 1/2 beta) of ropivacaine (25.9 +/- 1.7 min) was significantly shorter than for bupivacaine (39.1 +/- 13.3 min) after IV infusion. This was reflected by mean clearance values (Cl) for ropivacaine of 41.1 +/- 8.2 ml.min-1.kg-1 compared with 32.3 +/- 4.8 ml.min-1.kg-1 for bupivacaine, although the difference was not statistically significant. After epidural injections (ropivacaine n = 6; bupivacaine n = 5), a dose-related increase in Cmax was observed with both drugs. Although Cmax tended to be higher for ropivacaine, a significant difference was only attained when comparing Cmax after administration of 0.25% plain solutions of both agents. The addition of epinephrine did not consistently decrease the Cmax of either agent. The apparent t 1/2 beta of both agents was significantly longer after epidural administration than after IV infusion. No differences existed between t 1/2 beta values for ropivacaine and bupivacaine after epidural administration. Total body clearance of both agents tended to be lower after epidural administration, particularly when epinephrine-containing solutions were employed. Little difference existed between the two drugs when equivalent solutions were administered.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Key concepts: Ropivacaine, Bupivacaine, Medicine, Cmax, Local anesthetic, Pharmacokinetics, Anesthesia, Epidural administration

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative Pharmacokinetics of Bupivacaine and Ropivacaine, a New Amide Local Anesthetic — Research Paper | ScholarLens