1975Reviews of GeophysicsRequires access

Dynamic satellite geodesy

E. M. Gaposchkin

Open publisher page 3 citations

Abstract

Since the last quadrennial report [Gaposchkin, 1971], dynamic satellite geodesy has been continually refined with several new and independent solutions for the gravity field [Yionoulis et al., 1972; Gaposchkin, 1973a, 1974; Lerch et al., 1972a, b, 1974; Lerch and Wagner, 1972; Rapp, 1971a, 1973a, b, 1974a; Koch, 1972, 1974; Koch and Witte, 1971; Koch and Morrison, 1970] and station coordinates [Anderle, 1974a; Gaposchkin, 1973a, 1974; Lerch et al., 1972a, b, 1974; Lerch and Wagner, 1972; Marsh et al., 1971, 1972, 1973a, b; Koch, 1972, 1974; Koch and Witte, 1971; Koch and Morrison, 1970]. The new results have led to a consolidation of the discipline and have provided general agreement for these geodetic parameters. In addition, a milestone was achieved with the completion of The National Geodetic Satellite Program (NGSP), sponsored by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Many of the above‐mentioned results, the product of that program, are documented by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration [1975]. The NGSP was based on what have become classical satellite methods. In addition, some new and exciting observing techniques, now coming into use under the sponsorship of the NASA Earth and Ocean Physics Applications Program (Eopap), will be complementary to the classical satellite and terrestrial methods. These techniques include the use of satellite‐to‐sea‐surface radar altimetry and satellite‐to‐satellite tracking. An important technological achievement was accomplished with the successful launch and operation of the surface force compensated satellite Triad [Black, 1973]; such force compensation allows the corrupting effects of nongravitational forces to be eliminated from future geodetic analyses. A similar objective is sought with the imminent launch of Lageos, which will be used for the dynamical determination, to centimeter accuracy, of site locations, polar motion, and crustal displacement.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Since the last quadrennial report [Gaposchkin, 1971], dynamic satellite geodesy has been continually refined with several new and independent solutions for the gravity field [Yionoulis et al., 1972; Gaposchkin, 1973a, 1974; Lerch et al., 1972a, b, 1974; Lerch and Wagner, 1972; Rapp, 1971a, 1973a, b, 1974a; Koch, 1972, 1974; Koch and Witte, 1971; Koch and Morrison, 1970] and station coordinates [Anderle, 1974a; Gaposchkin, 1973a, 1974; Lerch et al., 1972a, b, 1974; Lerch and Wagner, 1972; Marsh et al., 1971, 1972, 1973a, b; Koch, 1972, 1974; Koch and Witte, 1971; Koch and Morrison, 1970]. The new results have led to a consolidation of the discipline and have provided general agreement for these geodetic parameters. In addition, a milestone was achieved with the completion of The National Geodetic Satellite Program (NGSP), sponsored by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Many of the above‐mentioned results, the product of that program, are documented by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration [1975]. The NGSP was based on what have become classical satellite methods. In addition, some new and exciting observing techniques, now coming into use under the sponsorship of the NASA Earth and Ocean Physics Applications Program (Eopap), will be complementary to the classical satellite and terrestrial methods. These techniques include the use of satellite‐to‐sea‐surface radar altimetry and satellite‐to‐satellite tracking. An important technological achievement was accomplished with the successful launch and operation of the surface force compensated satellite Triad [Black, 1973]; such force compensation allows the corrupting effects of nongravitational forces to be eliminated from future geodetic analyses. A similar objective is sought with the imminent launch of Lageos, which will be used for the dynamical determination, to centimeter accuracy, of site locations, polar motion, and crustal displacement.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Since the last quadrennial report [Gaposchkin, 1971], dynamic satellite geodesy has been continually refined with several new and independent solutions for the gravity field [Yionoulis et al., 1972; Gaposchkin, 1973a, 1974; Lerch et al., 1972a, b, 1974; Lerch and Wagner, 1972; Rapp, 1971a, 1973a, b, 1974a; Koch, 1972, 1974; Koch and Witte, 1971; Koch and Morrison, 1970] and station coordinates [Anderle, 1974a; Gaposchkin, 1973a, 1974; Lerch et al., 1972a, b, 1974; Lerch and Wagner, 1972; Marsh et al., 1971, 1972, 1973a, b; Koch, 1972, 1974; Koch and Witte, 1971; Koch and Morrison, 1970]. The new results have led to a consolidation of the discipline and have provided general agreement for these geodetic parameters. In addition, a milestone was achieved with the completion of The National Geodetic Satellite Program (NGSP), sponsored by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). Many of the above‐mentioned results, the product of that program, are documented by the National Aeronautics and Space Administration [1975]. The NGSP was based on what have become classical satellite methods. In addition, some new and exciting observing techniques, now coming into use under the sponsorship of the NASA Earth and Ocean Physics Applications Program (Eopap), will be complementary to the classical satellite and terrestrial methods. These techniques include the use of satellite‐to‐sea‐surface radar altimetry and satellite‐to‐satellite tracking. An important technological achievement was accomplished with the successful launch and operation of the surface force compensated satellite Triad [Black, 1973]; such force compensation allows the corrupting effects of nongravitational forces to be eliminated from future geodetic analyses. A similar objective is sought with the imminent launch of Lageos, which will be used for the dynamical determination, to centimeter accuracy, of site locations, polar motion, and crustal displacement.

Key concepts: Satellite, Satellite laser ranging, Geodesy, Computer science, Geography, Engineering, Aerospace engineering, Physics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Dynamic satellite geodesy — Research Paper | ScholarLens