2002Journal of Asia-Pacific BusinessRequires access

The Integration and Comparison of Market Orientation Constructs

Arthur Cheng‐Hsui Chen

Open publisher page 1 citations

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare the construct validity of market orientation between two mainstream models–the Kohli and Jaworski (1990) and Narver and Slater (1990). An integrated market orientation construct with four components–customer oriented intelligence generation, competitor oriented intelligence generation, inter-functional dissemination, and responsiveness was derived. One hundred and sixty-two hospitals in Taiwan were utilized as research objects to empirically test the reliability and validity of the measurement model fit among the three market orientation models. The results indicate that the integrated model has better construct validity versus the two other mainstream models in terms of measurement model fit using confirmatory factor analysis. Meanwhile, when using different analytical methods to test the association between market orientation and performance, the integrated model not only outperforms the other two models in the structural equation modeling test, but also provides a more comprehensive explanation in the stepwise regression model. However, in the analytical method comparison, LISREL generated more consistent results across all three models versus stepwise regression.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The purpose of this study is to compare the construct validity of market orientation between two mainstream models–the Kohli and Jaworski (1990) and Narver and Slater (1990). An integrated market orientation construct with four components–customer oriented intelligence generation, competitor oriented intelligence generation, inter-functional dissemination, and responsiveness was derived. One hundred and sixty-two hospitals in Taiwan were utilized as research objects to empirically test the reliability and validity of the measurement model fit among the three market orientation models. The results indicate that the integrated model has better construct validity versus the two other mainstream models in terms of measurement model fit using confirmatory factor analysis. Meanwhile, when using different analytical methods to test the association between market orientation and performance, the integrated model not only outperforms the other two models in the structural equation modeling test, but also provides a more comprehensive explanation in the stepwise regression model. However, in the analytical method comparison, LISREL generated more consistent results across all three models versus stepwise regression.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 1 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare the construct validity of market orientation between two mainstream models–the Kohli and Jaworski (1990) and Narver and Slater (1990). An integrated market orientation construct with four components–customer oriented intelligence generation, competitor oriented intelligence generation, inter-functional dissemination, and responsiveness was derived. One hundred and sixty-two hospitals in Taiwan were utilized as research objects to empirically test the reliability and validity of the measurement model fit among the three market orientation models. The results indicate that the integrated model has better construct validity versus the two other mainstream models in terms of measurement model fit using confirmatory factor analysis. Meanwhile, when using different analytical methods to test the association between market orientation and performance, the integrated model not only outperforms the other two models in the structural equation modeling test, but also provides a more comprehensive explanation in the stepwise regression model. However, in the analytical method comparison, LISREL generated more consistent results across all three models versus stepwise regression.

Key concepts: LISREL, Confirmatory factor analysis, Structural equation modeling, Market orientation, Construct (python library), Construct validity, Regression analysis, Econometrics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Integration and Comparison of Market Orientation Constructs — Research Paper | ScholarLens