Trainee Glaucoma Surgery: Experience with Trabeculectomy and Glaucoma Drainage Devices
M. Connor, Robert M. Knape, Matthew H. Oltmanns, Mary Fran Smith
Abstract
M. Connor, Robert M. Knape, Matthew H. Oltmanns, Mary Fran Smith
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To examine outcomes of trabeculectomy with mitomycin C and glaucoma drainage device placement for uncontrolled glaucoma when performed by resident surgeons. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included any patient who underwent a trabeculectomy with mitomycin C (n = 93) or a glaucoma drainage device (n = 60) by a resident surgeon between 2001 and 2006. Outcome measures at 3, 6, and 12 months included failure of treatment, number of follow-up appointments, complications, number of medications, and need for further surgery. RESULTS: One year postoperatively, intraocular pressure averaged 12.1 ± 5.1 mm Hg in the trabeculectomy group and 13.0 ± 5.1 mm Hg in the glaucoma drainage device group (P = .31). Complications occurred in 30% of eyes with trabeculectomy and 10% of eyes with a glaucoma drainage device. CONCLUSION: During the first postoperative year, glaucoma drainage device surgery may have fewer complications and less morbidity than a trabeculectomy with mitomycin C when these surgeries are performed by resident surgeons. Final intraocular pressures were similar between the two groups.
OpenAlex reports 16 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To examine outcomes of trabeculectomy with mitomycin C and glaucoma drainage device placement for uncontrolled glaucoma when performed by resident surgeons. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This study included any patient who underwent a trabeculectomy with mitomycin C (n = 93) or a glaucoma drainage device (n = 60) by a resident surgeon between 2001 and 2006. Outcome measures at 3, 6, and 12 months included failure of treatment, number of follow-up appointments, complications, number of medications, and need for further surgery. RESULTS: One year postoperatively, intraocular pressure averaged 12.1 ± 5.1 mm Hg in the trabeculectomy group and 13.0 ± 5.1 mm Hg in the glaucoma drainage device group (P = .31). Complications occurred in 30% of eyes with trabeculectomy and 10% of eyes with a glaucoma drainage device. CONCLUSION: During the first postoperative year, glaucoma drainage device surgery may have fewer complications and less morbidity than a trabeculectomy with mitomycin C when these surgeries are performed by resident surgeons. Final intraocular pressures were similar between the two groups.
Key concepts: Trabeculectomy, Medicine, Glaucoma, Intraocular pressure, Mitomycin C, Glaucoma surgery, Surgery, Drainage