1956•American Journal of PsychiatryRequires access

CLINICAL EVALUATION OF AZACYCLONOL, CHLORPROMAZINE, AND RESERPINE ON A GROUP OF CHRONIC PSYCHOTIC PATIENTS

Franco Rinaldi, LESTER H. RUDY, Harold E. Himwich

Open publisher page 36 citations

Abstract

1. Clinical evaluations of azacyclonol, reserpine, and chlorpromazine were made in turn on the same group of chronic, moderately disturbed, psychotic patients, most of whom revealed schizophrenic reactions maintained through long hospitalization. 2. Beneficial results were obtained with each of the 3 drugs, but not necessarily in the same patients; nor were all patients helped by any one drug. 3. Consideration of the total number of patient improvements in our limited series showed reserpine to be best, closely followed by chlorpromazine, and then by azacyclonol. 4. From the analysis of the results in relation to the different diagnostic categories, it would seem that the hebephrenic and hebephreno-catatoonic patients were helped most by reserpine, next came azacyclonol, while chlorpromazine was least effective. In the treatment of paranoid patients chlorpromazine was most beneficial, followed by reserpine, and then by azacyclonol. The schizo-affective patients exhibited best improvement with chlorpromazine. One case of involutional depression was strikingly benefited by reserpine. 5. Limiting the validity of these conclusions to the types of patients studied we find that it is possible to differentiate between the use of each of these drugs in different psychiatric categories and to indicate the choice of drug that may prove most useful in the treatment of a given case.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

1. Clinical evaluations of azacyclonol, reserpine, and chlorpromazine were made in turn on the same group of chronic, moderately disturbed, psychotic patients, most of whom revealed schizophrenic reactions maintained through long hospitalization. 2. Beneficial results were obtained with each of the 3 drugs, but not necessarily in the same patients; nor were all patients helped by any one drug. 3. Consideration of the total number of patient improvements in our limited series showed reserpine to be best, closely followed by chlorpromazine, and then by azacyclonol. 4. From the analysis of the results in relation to the different diagnostic categories, it would seem that the hebephrenic and hebephreno-catatoonic patients were helped most by reserpine, next came azacyclonol, while chlorpromazine was least effective. In the treatment of paranoid patients chlorpromazine was most beneficial, followed by reserpine, and then by azacyclonol. The schizo-affective patients exhibited best improvement with chlorpromazine. One case of involutional depression was strikingly benefited by reserpine. 5. Limiting the validity of these conclusions to the types of patients studied we find that it is possible to differentiate between the use of each of these drugs in different psychiatric categories and to indicate the choice of drug that may prove most useful in the treatment of a given case.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 36 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

1. Clinical evaluations of azacyclonol, reserpine, and chlorpromazine were made in turn on the same group of chronic, moderately disturbed, psychotic patients, most of whom revealed schizophrenic reactions maintained through long hospitalization. 2. Beneficial results were obtained with each of the 3 drugs, but not necessarily in the same patients; nor were all patients helped by any one drug. 3. Consideration of the total number of patient improvements in our limited series showed reserpine to be best, closely followed by chlorpromazine, and then by azacyclonol. 4. From the analysis of the results in relation to the different diagnostic categories, it would seem that the hebephrenic and hebephreno-catatoonic patients were helped most by reserpine, next came azacyclonol, while chlorpromazine was least effective. In the treatment of paranoid patients chlorpromazine was most beneficial, followed by reserpine, and then by azacyclonol. The schizo-affective patients exhibited best improvement with chlorpromazine. One case of involutional depression was strikingly benefited by reserpine. 5. Limiting the validity of these conclusions to the types of patients studied we find that it is possible to differentiate between the use of each of these drugs in different psychiatric categories and to indicate the choice of drug that may prove most useful in the treatment of a given case.

Key concepts: Reserpine, Chlorpromazine, Schizophrenia (object-oriented programming), Drug, Drug treatment, Psychosis, Depression (economics), Psychiatry

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
CLINICAL EVALUATION OF AZACYCLONOL, CHLORPROMAZINE, AND RESERPINE ON A GROUP OF CHRONIC PSYCHOTIC PATIENTS — Research Paper | ScholarLens