2010History Workshop JournalRequires access

Writing Cosmopolitan Lives: Joseph and Kwame Anthony Appiah

Barbara Caine

Open publisher page 5 citations

Abstract

The idea of cosmopolitanism continues to attract many scholars concerned with the mutual responsibilities of an increasingly global world. But there is no agreed definition of cosmopolitanism, and indeed some difference of opinion about the relative importance of ideas about world citizenship, on the one hand, and of questions about culture and identity, on the other. One of the theorists who attaches most importance to the ethical and aesthetic issues involved in cosmopolitanism is Kwame Anthony Appiah. This essay explores some of his ideas about cosmopolitanism, looking particularly at the importance of stories and of his own family in the way he defines and explains it. In drawing on his family, and particularly on the autobiography of his Ghanaian father, Joe Appiah, he immediately moves beyond the Eurocentrism that continues to cling to the idea of cosmopolitanism. At the same time, the social privilege of the Appiah family raises questions about how widely applicable their experiences are, while the gender blindness evident in the writing of both father and son make some of Appiah's arguments extremely problematic.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The idea of cosmopolitanism continues to attract many scholars concerned with the mutual responsibilities of an increasingly global world. But there is no agreed definition of cosmopolitanism, and indeed some difference of opinion about the relative importance of ideas about world citizenship, on the one hand, and of questions about culture and identity, on the other. One of the theorists who attaches most importance to the ethical and aesthetic issues involved in cosmopolitanism is Kwame Anthony Appiah. This essay explores some of his ideas about cosmopolitanism, looking particularly at the importance of stories and of his own family in the way he defines and explains it. In drawing on his family, and particularly on the autobiography of his Ghanaian father, Joe Appiah, he immediately moves beyond the Eurocentrism that continues to cling to the idea of cosmopolitanism. At the same time, the social privilege of the Appiah family raises questions about how widely applicable their experiences are, while the gender blindness evident in the writing of both father and son make some of Appiah's arguments extremely problematic.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 5 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The idea of cosmopolitanism continues to attract many scholars concerned with the mutual responsibilities of an increasingly global world. But there is no agreed definition of cosmopolitanism, and indeed some difference of opinion about the relative importance of ideas about world citizenship, on the one hand, and of questions about culture and identity, on the other. One of the theorists who attaches most importance to the ethical and aesthetic issues involved in cosmopolitanism is Kwame Anthony Appiah. This essay explores some of his ideas about cosmopolitanism, looking particularly at the importance of stories and of his own family in the way he defines and explains it. In drawing on his family, and particularly on the autobiography of his Ghanaian father, Joe Appiah, he immediately moves beyond the Eurocentrism that continues to cling to the idea of cosmopolitanism. At the same time, the social privilege of the Appiah family raises questions about how widely applicable their experiences are, while the gender blindness evident in the writing of both father and son make some of Appiah's arguments extremely problematic.

Key concepts: Cosmopolitanism, Kwame, Sociology, Identity (music), Privilege (computing), Aesthetics, Gender studies, Epistemology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Writing Cosmopolitan Lives: Joseph and Kwame Anthony Appiah — Research Paper | ScholarLens