2002Proceedings of SPIE, the International Society for Optical Engineering/Proceedings of SPIERequires access

PMJ 2002 Panel Discussion Review: Lithography Strategy from 90 to 65 nm Nodes: ArF, F 2 , or EPL?

Hiroyoshi Tanabe, Yoshinori Nagaoka

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

We discussed the following topics at the panel discussion of Photomask Japan 2002. 1) Pushing the limit of ArF lithography: How far ArF lithography will extend? 2) Current status and issues for F2 lithography, 3) Current status and issues for EPL, 4) Current status and issues for F2 and NGL masks, 5) Lithography tool selection from 90- to 65- nm nodes. ArF lithography could extend to 65-nm node by using alternating phase shift masks. F2 lithography and EPL are not yet established and we need to solve many issues for practical applications. The choice of lithography tools in 65-nm node depends on devices and layers. Multiple lithography tools might be used in 65-nm node.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

We discussed the following topics at the panel discussion of Photomask Japan 2002. 1) Pushing the limit of ArF lithography: How far ArF lithography will extend? 2) Current status and issues for F2 lithography, 3) Current status and issues for EPL, 4) Current status and issues for F2 and NGL masks, 5) Lithography tool selection from 90- to 65- nm nodes. ArF lithography could extend to 65-nm node by using alternating phase shift masks. F2 lithography and EPL are not yet established and we need to solve many issues for practical applications. The choice of lithography tools in 65-nm node depends on devices and layers. Multiple lithography tools might be used in 65-nm node.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

We discussed the following topics at the panel discussion of Photomask Japan 2002. 1) Pushing the limit of ArF lithography: How far ArF lithography will extend? 2) Current status and issues for F2 lithography, 3) Current status and issues for EPL, 4) Current status and issues for F2 and NGL masks, 5) Lithography tool selection from 90- to 65- nm nodes. ArF lithography could extend to 65-nm node by using alternating phase shift masks. F2 lithography and EPL are not yet established and we need to solve many issues for practical applications. The choice of lithography tools in 65-nm node depends on devices and layers. Multiple lithography tools might be used in 65-nm node.

Key concepts: Computational lithography, Lithography, Photomask, Next-generation lithography, Multiple patterning, Extreme ultraviolet lithography, Immersion lithography, Photolithography

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
PMJ 2002 Panel Discussion Review: Lithography Strategy from 90 to 65 nm Nodes: ArF, F 2 , or EPL? — Research Paper | ScholarLens