A comparison study of the convergence characteristics and robustness for four variants of SIMPLE‐family at fine grids

A comparative study is performed to reveal the convergence characteristics and the robustness of four variants in the semi‐implicit method for pressure‐linked equations (SIMPLE)‐family: SIMPLE, SIMPLE revised (SIMPLER), SIMPLE consistent (SIMPLEC), and SIMPLE extrapolation (SIMPLEX). The focus is concentrated in the solution at fine grid system. Four typical fluid flow and heat transfer problems are taken as the numerical examples (lid‐driven cavity flow, flow in an axisymmetric sudden expansion, flow in an annulus with inner surface rotating and the natural convection in a square enclosure). It is found that an appropriate convergence condition should include both mass conservation and momentum conservation requirements. For the four problems computed, the SIMPLEX always requires the largest computational time, the SIMPLER comes the next, and the computational time of SIMPLE and SIMPLEC are the least. As far as the robustness is concerned, the SIMPLE algorithm is the worst, the SIMPLER comes the next and the robustness of SIMPLEX and SIMPLEC are superior to the others. The SIMPLEC algorithm is then recommended, especially for the computation at a fine grid system. Brief discussion is provided to further reveal the reasons which may account for the difference of the four algorithms.