Belief‐Ful Realism and Scientific Realism
Ronald B. MacLennan
Abstract
Ronald B. MacLennan
Abstract
Despite tensions between Tillich's category of belief‐ful realism and a view of science that embraces metaphysical and epistemological realism, a constructive relationship can be developed between the two. Both are based on common understandings about reality. Belief‐ful or theonomous realism thus affirms scientific realism. On the other hand, scientific realism is open to the ecstatic, self‐transcending elements of belief‐ful realism. Finally, Tillich's formulation of the relationship between culture and religion can be reformulated specifically to include scientific and technological culture.
A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Despite tensions between Tillich's category of belief‐ful realism and a view of science that embraces metaphysical and epistemological realism, a constructive relationship can be developed between the two. Both are based on common understandings about reality. Belief‐ful or theonomous realism thus affirms scientific realism. On the other hand, scientific realism is open to the ecstatic, self‐transcending elements of belief‐ful realism. Finally, Tillich's formulation of the relationship between culture and religion can be reformulated specifically to include scientific and technological culture.
Key concepts: Realism, Scientific realism, Epistemology, Philosophical realism, Metaphysics, Philosophy, Critical realism (philosophy of perception), Constructive