2022Cambridge University Press eBooksRequires access

Realism

Haṡok Chang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Scientific realism is usually taken as a thesis that science states the truth about the world. In contrast, I conceive realism in and about science as a commitment to maximize our learning about realities. This is an operational and realistic ideal because realities are mind-framed entities, and we can learn empirical truths about them by devising operationally coherent activities involving them. My brand of realism is akin to Putnam’s internal realism, and perspectival realism. The mode of inquiry motivated by realism as I see it is iterative, because inquiry must start from some inherited basis. And it is pluralist in the sense of recommending that inquiry should explore multiple directions with no in-principle restrictions. While my conception of realism is modest in some clear ways, it is also ambitious, in that it follows an imperative of progress: always seek to increase and improve knowledge maximally. For this reason I designate my position as ‘activist realism’.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Scientific realism is usually taken as a thesis that science states the truth about the world. In contrast, I conceive realism in and about science as a commitment to maximize our learning about realities. This is an operational and realistic ideal because realities are mind-framed entities, and we can learn empirical truths about them by devising operationally coherent activities involving them. My brand of realism is akin to Putnam’s internal realism, and perspectival realism. The mode of inquiry motivated by realism as I see it is iterative, because inquiry must start from some inherited basis. And it is pluralist in the sense of recommending that inquiry should explore multiple directions with no in-principle restrictions. While my conception of realism is modest in some clear ways, it is also ambitious, in that it follows an imperative of progress: always seek to increase and improve knowledge maximally. For this reason I designate my position as ‘activist realism’.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Scientific realism is usually taken as a thesis that science states the truth about the world. In contrast, I conceive realism in and about science as a commitment to maximize our learning about realities. This is an operational and realistic ideal because realities are mind-framed entities, and we can learn empirical truths about them by devising operationally coherent activities involving them. My brand of realism is akin to Putnam’s internal realism, and perspectival realism. The mode of inquiry motivated by realism as I see it is iterative, because inquiry must start from some inherited basis. And it is pluralist in the sense of recommending that inquiry should explore multiple directions with no in-principle restrictions. While my conception of realism is modest in some clear ways, it is also ambitious, in that it follows an imperative of progress: always seek to increase and improve knowledge maximally. For this reason I designate my position as ‘activist realism’.

Key concepts: Realism, Scientific realism, Philosophical realism, Epistemology, Critical realism (philosophy of perception), Direct and indirect realism, Philosophy

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Realism — Research Paper | ScholarLens