1976Language LearningRequires access

METHODS AND MORPHEMES IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION RESEARCH1

Ellen J. Rosansky

Open publisher page 82 citations

Abstract

Recent morpheme studies of second language acquisition are methodologically difficult to interpret and the validity of some conclusions is questionable. The present study sought to ascertain (a) whether the morpheme order obtained using an elicitation instrument resembles the order of morphemes obtained from spontaneously collected second language acquisition speech data, and (b) whether the cross‐sectional and longitudinal research findings in second language acquisition research are comparable. The results of the study raise serious questions about the validity of cross‐sectional studies of second language acquisition based on instrument‐elicited morpheme data. The analysis of spontaneous data examined longitudinally suggests that such data may provide richer insights into the second language acquisition process.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Recent morpheme studies of second language acquisition are methodologically difficult to interpret and the validity of some conclusions is questionable. The present study sought to ascertain (a) whether the morpheme order obtained using an elicitation instrument resembles the order of morphemes obtained from spontaneously collected second language acquisition speech data, and (b) whether the cross‐sectional and longitudinal research findings in second language acquisition research are comparable. The results of the study raise serious questions about the validity of cross‐sectional studies of second language acquisition based on instrument‐elicited morpheme data. The analysis of spontaneous data examined longitudinally suggests that such data may provide richer insights into the second language acquisition process.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 82 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Recent morpheme studies of second language acquisition are methodologically difficult to interpret and the validity of some conclusions is questionable. The present study sought to ascertain (a) whether the morpheme order obtained using an elicitation instrument resembles the order of morphemes obtained from spontaneously collected second language acquisition speech data, and (b) whether the cross‐sectional and longitudinal research findings in second language acquisition research are comparable. The results of the study raise serious questions about the validity of cross‐sectional studies of second language acquisition based on instrument‐elicited morpheme data. The analysis of spontaneous data examined longitudinally suggests that such data may provide richer insights into the second language acquisition process.

Key concepts: Morpheme, Second-language acquisition, Psychology, Language acquisition, Linguistics, Developmental linguistics, Psycholinguistics, Computer science

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
METHODS AND MORPHEMES IN SECOND LANGUAGE ACQUISITION RESEARCH1 — Research Paper | ScholarLens