2000International Journal of Heritage StudiesRequires access

Cultural Heritage Management in Post-colonial Polities:notthe heritage of the other

Darrin Lee Long

Open publisher page 21 citations

Abstract

The recognition of cultural heritage management as an international phenomenon masks the issue of the management of cultural heritage within local contexts, and how the administration of the past at this level is influenced by and influences the global process.The dynamics of cultural heritage management observed during fieldwork in Australia and Zimbabwe has highlighted the existence of a ?creolised? heritage which informs and is informed by both professional and popular constructions of heritage. Creolised heritage highlights the hybrid nature of cultural interactions between exotic and familiar elements of cultural heritage, between people, places and objects. By acknowledging the creolised nature of cultural heritage, and its fundamental role in the theory and practice of cultural heritage management, we can develop more flexible and sensitive ways to manage cultural heritage in the living present.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The recognition of cultural heritage management as an international phenomenon masks the issue of the management of cultural heritage within local contexts, and how the administration of the past at this level is influenced by and influences the global process.The dynamics of cultural heritage management observed during fieldwork in Australia and Zimbabwe has highlighted the existence of a ?creolised? heritage which informs and is informed by both professional and popular constructions of heritage. Creolised heritage highlights the hybrid nature of cultural interactions between exotic and familiar elements of cultural heritage, between people, places and objects. By acknowledging the creolised nature of cultural heritage, and its fundamental role in the theory and practice of cultural heritage management, we can develop more flexible and sensitive ways to manage cultural heritage in the living present.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 21 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The recognition of cultural heritage management as an international phenomenon masks the issue of the management of cultural heritage within local contexts, and how the administration of the past at this level is influenced by and influences the global process.The dynamics of cultural heritage management observed during fieldwork in Australia and Zimbabwe has highlighted the existence of a ?creolised? heritage which informs and is informed by both professional and popular constructions of heritage. Creolised heritage highlights the hybrid nature of cultural interactions between exotic and familiar elements of cultural heritage, between people, places and objects. By acknowledging the creolised nature of cultural heritage, and its fundamental role in the theory and practice of cultural heritage management, we can develop more flexible and sensitive ways to manage cultural heritage in the living present.

Key concepts: Cultural heritage management, Cultural heritage, Values, Industrial heritage, Environmental ethics, Sociology, Political science, Aesthetics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Cultural Heritage Management in Post-colonial Polities:notthe heritage of the other — Research Paper | ScholarLens