2002Medicine & Science in Sports & ExerciseRequires access

THE EFFECTS OF RESISTANCE TRAINING VOLUME AND VARIETY ON MOOD STATE

Janet T. Peterson, S K. Smith, Bryan L. Haddock, Glen Blix, Helen Hopp Marshak

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

The Profile of Mood States (POMS) has recently become a popular and useful psychometric instrument to assess the effects of exercise and physical activity in sport related research. PURPOSE: To examine the effects of resistance training volume and variety on mood state in an untrained population. METHODS: A total of 53 male and female subjects, 30.6 + 0.9 yrs, were randomized into one of three groups, differing in resistance training volume and variety for 24 weeks as follows: (1) One set of eight strength training exercises, (2) Three sets of the same eight exercises, as in group 1 and (3) One set of 24 different exercises incorporating the same exercises as groups 1 and 2, plus an additional 16 exercises. At baseline, 12 and 24 weeks of training, subjects completed the 65-item POMS questionnaire. RESULTS: Using repeated measures ANOVA and controlling for gender and age, there were no significant differences (p > .05) between groups on any of the seven POMS mood scores observed. Despite the lack of significant differences between groups, by the 24th week of the study all groups showed a slight trend towards reductions in the negative, and increases in the positive mood states. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that there are no significant differences in mood state(s) between those who trained with one set of eight exercises for a average of 20 minutes, three sets of the same eight exercises for an average of 60 minutes or with one set of 24 exercises for an average of 60 minutes.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The Profile of Mood States (POMS) has recently become a popular and useful psychometric instrument to assess the effects of exercise and physical activity in sport related research. PURPOSE: To examine the effects of resistance training volume and variety on mood state in an untrained population. METHODS: A total of 53 male and female subjects, 30.6 + 0.9 yrs, were randomized into one of three groups, differing in resistance training volume and variety for 24 weeks as follows: (1) One set of eight strength training exercises, (2) Three sets of the same eight exercises, as in group 1 and (3) One set of 24 different exercises incorporating the same exercises as groups 1 and 2, plus an additional 16 exercises. At baseline, 12 and 24 weeks of training, subjects completed the 65-item POMS questionnaire. RESULTS: Using repeated measures ANOVA and controlling for gender and age, there were no significant differences (p > .05) between groups on any of the seven POMS mood scores observed. Despite the lack of significant differences between groups, by the 24th week of the study all groups showed a slight trend towards reductions in the negative, and increases in the positive mood states. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that there are no significant differences in mood state(s) between those who trained with one set of eight exercises for a average of 20 minutes, three sets of the same eight exercises for an average of 60 minutes or with one set of 24 exercises for an average of 60 minutes.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The Profile of Mood States (POMS) has recently become a popular and useful psychometric instrument to assess the effects of exercise and physical activity in sport related research. PURPOSE: To examine the effects of resistance training volume and variety on mood state in an untrained population. METHODS: A total of 53 male and female subjects, 30.6 + 0.9 yrs, were randomized into one of three groups, differing in resistance training volume and variety for 24 weeks as follows: (1) One set of eight strength training exercises, (2) Three sets of the same eight exercises, as in group 1 and (3) One set of 24 different exercises incorporating the same exercises as groups 1 and 2, plus an additional 16 exercises. At baseline, 12 and 24 weeks of training, subjects completed the 65-item POMS questionnaire. RESULTS: Using repeated measures ANOVA and controlling for gender and age, there were no significant differences (p > .05) between groups on any of the seven POMS mood scores observed. Despite the lack of significant differences between groups, by the 24th week of the study all groups showed a slight trend towards reductions in the negative, and increases in the positive mood states. CONCLUSIONS: This study indicates that there are no significant differences in mood state(s) between those who trained with one set of eight exercises for a average of 20 minutes, three sets of the same eight exercises for an average of 60 minutes or with one set of 24 exercises for an average of 60 minutes.

Key concepts: Profile of mood states, Mood, Resistance training, Physical therapy, Population, Medicine, Psychology, Clinical psychology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
THE EFFECTS OF RESISTANCE TRAINING VOLUME AND VARIETY ON MOOD STATE — Research Paper | ScholarLens