A Comparison of Various Methods of Estimating Spermatozoa Concentration of Turkey Semen
K.I. Brown, KARL E. NESTOR, Margery Topscher
Abstract
K.I. Brown, KARL E. NESTOR, Margery Topscher
Abstract
SEVERAL methods have been used to estimate the spermatozoa concentration of chicken and turkey semen. Most of these methods involve actual spermatozoa counts (haemocytometer, Coulter counter), packed cell volume (hematocrit) or optical density (colorimeter, spectrophotometer). Jones and Wilson (1967) compared spermatozoa concentration of chicken semen obtained by the haemocytometer method with that determined electronically with a Coulter counter. They found that spermatozoa counts obtained with the Coulter counter were less variable and required less time. The coefficients of variation with the haemocytometer and Coulter counter methods were 10.2 and 2.7 percent respectively. There are no reports in the literature on the use of the Coulter counter for counting turkey spermatozoa. McCartney et al. (1958) and McCartney and Brown (1959) compared spermatozoa counts (haemocytometer) and packed cell volume of semen from small and large type white turkeys. McCartney et al. (1958) observed a highly significant correlation of +.67 between the values…
OpenAlex reports 19 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
SEVERAL methods have been used to estimate the spermatozoa concentration of chicken and turkey semen. Most of these methods involve actual spermatozoa counts (haemocytometer, Coulter counter), packed cell volume (hematocrit) or optical density (colorimeter, spectrophotometer). Jones and Wilson (1967) compared spermatozoa concentration of chicken semen obtained by the haemocytometer method with that determined electronically with a Coulter counter. They found that spermatozoa counts obtained with the Coulter counter were less variable and required less time. The coefficients of variation with the haemocytometer and Coulter counter methods were 10.2 and 2.7 percent respectively. There are no reports in the literature on the use of the Coulter counter for counting turkey spermatozoa. McCartney et al. (1958) and McCartney and Brown (1959) compared spermatozoa counts (haemocytometer) and packed cell volume of semen from small and large type white turkeys. McCartney et al. (1958) observed a highly significant correlation of +.67 between the values…
Key concepts: Hemocytometer, Coulter counter, Semen, Hematocrit, Colorimeter, Chemistry, Animal science, Chromatography