The Pivotal Role of Vasopressin in Refractory Anaphylactic Shock
Claudia Schummer, Melanie Wirsing, Wolfram Schummer
Abstract
Claudia Schummer, Melanie Wirsing, Wolfram Schummer
Abstract
In Brief BACKGROUND: Severe anaphylaxis can be associated with cardiovascular collapse that is difficult to manage and does not respond to treatment with epinephrine. Because anaphylaxis is uncommon, unpredictable and may be fatal, a prospective, randomized, controlled trial in humans on the best management is difficult and guidelines are based on theory and anecdotes only. METHODS AND RESULTS: We report six cases in which the use of vasopressin was successful in the treatment of anaphylactic shock. CONCLUSIONS: Standard treatment of anaphylactic shock, including discontinuation of the causative agent, administration of epinephrine, and infusion of IV fluids, did not stabilize cardiocirculatory function, and adding arginine vasopressors resulted in prompt hemodynamic stabilization. IMPLICATIONS: Because anaphylaxis is uncommon, unpredictable and may be fatal, a prospective, randomized, controlled trial in humans on the best management is difficult and guidelines are based on theory and anecdotes only. We add six more anecdotes in which the use of vasopressin was successful in the treatment of anaphylactic shock.
OpenAlex reports 78 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In Brief BACKGROUND: Severe anaphylaxis can be associated with cardiovascular collapse that is difficult to manage and does not respond to treatment with epinephrine. Because anaphylaxis is uncommon, unpredictable and may be fatal, a prospective, randomized, controlled trial in humans on the best management is difficult and guidelines are based on theory and anecdotes only. METHODS AND RESULTS: We report six cases in which the use of vasopressin was successful in the treatment of anaphylactic shock. CONCLUSIONS: Standard treatment of anaphylactic shock, including discontinuation of the causative agent, administration of epinephrine, and infusion of IV fluids, did not stabilize cardiocirculatory function, and adding arginine vasopressors resulted in prompt hemodynamic stabilization. IMPLICATIONS: Because anaphylaxis is uncommon, unpredictable and may be fatal, a prospective, randomized, controlled trial in humans on the best management is difficult and guidelines are based on theory and anecdotes only. We add six more anecdotes in which the use of vasopressin was successful in the treatment of anaphylactic shock.
Key concepts: Medicine, Anaphylaxis, Vasopressin, Discontinuation, Epinephrine, Anaphylactic shock, Shock (circulatory), Refractory (planetary science)