2003Expert Opinion on PharmacotherapyRequires access

ACE inhibitors or AT-1 antagonists – which is OPTIMAAL after acute myocardial infarction?

Sheila A Doggrell

Open publisher page 4 citations

Abstract

OPTIMAAL (Optimal Trial in Myocardial Infarction with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan) is the first major study to compare an angiotensin II Type 1 antagonist losartan (Cozaar trade mark, Merck) with an ACE inhibitor captonpril (Capoten trade mark, Elan) after myocardial infarction in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Patients were assigned to a target dose of losartan 50 mg/day and captopril 50 mg t.i.d., as tolerated. The primary end point was all-cause mortality and there were 499 (18%) and 447 (16%) deaths in the losartan and captopril group, respectively (p = 0.07). However, there were significantly more cardiovascular deaths with losartan (420, 15%) than with captopril (363, 13%; p = 0.03). Losartan was better tolerated than captopril with fewer patients discontinuing medication (17 versus 23% for losartan and captopril, respectively). In conclusion, if tolerated, captopril should remain the preferred treatment for patients after complicated acute myocardial infarction.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

OPTIMAAL (Optimal Trial in Myocardial Infarction with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan) is the first major study to compare an angiotensin II Type 1 antagonist losartan (Cozaar trade mark, Merck) with an ACE inhibitor captonpril (Capoten trade mark, Elan) after myocardial infarction in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Patients were assigned to a target dose of losartan 50 mg/day and captopril 50 mg t.i.d., as tolerated. The primary end point was all-cause mortality and there were 499 (18%) and 447 (16%) deaths in the losartan and captopril group, respectively (p = 0.07). However, there were significantly more cardiovascular deaths with losartan (420, 15%) than with captopril (363, 13%; p = 0.03). Losartan was better tolerated than captopril with fewer patients discontinuing medication (17 versus 23% for losartan and captopril, respectively). In conclusion, if tolerated, captopril should remain the preferred treatment for patients after complicated acute myocardial infarction.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 4 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

OPTIMAAL (Optimal Trial in Myocardial Infarction with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan) is the first major study to compare an angiotensin II Type 1 antagonist losartan (Cozaar trade mark, Merck) with an ACE inhibitor captonpril (Capoten trade mark, Elan) after myocardial infarction in patients with left ventricular dysfunction. Patients were assigned to a target dose of losartan 50 mg/day and captopril 50 mg t.i.d., as tolerated. The primary end point was all-cause mortality and there were 499 (18%) and 447 (16%) deaths in the losartan and captopril group, respectively (p = 0.07). However, there were significantly more cardiovascular deaths with losartan (420, 15%) than with captopril (363, 13%; p = 0.03). Losartan was better tolerated than captopril with fewer patients discontinuing medication (17 versus 23% for losartan and captopril, respectively). In conclusion, if tolerated, captopril should remain the preferred treatment for patients after complicated acute myocardial infarction.

Key concepts: Captopril, Losartan, Medicine, Myocardial infarction, Antagonist, Cardiology, Internal medicine, ACE inhibitor

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
ACE inhibitors or AT-1 antagonists – which is OPTIMAAL after acute myocardial infarction? — Research Paper | ScholarLens