2013•European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive BiologyRequires access

A comparison of outcomes from in vitro fertilization cycles stimulated with either recombinant luteinizing hormone (LH) or human chorionic gonadotropin acting as an LH analogue delivered as human menopausal gonadotropins, in subjects with good or poor ovarian reserve: A retrospective analysis

Michael Haim Dahan, Mohammed Agdi, Fady Shehata, Weon‐Young Son, Seang Lin Tan

Open publisher page 35 citations

Abstract

This record does not include an abstract. Use the full-text link above if available.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

An abstract is not available in the OpenAlex record for this paper.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 35 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Key concepts: Medicine, In vitro fertilisation, Pregnancy, Luteinizing hormone, Gonadotropin, Antral follicle, Follicle-stimulating hormone, Human chorionic gonadotropin

Back to paper search Browse research topics Original source

A comparison of outcomes from in vitro fertilization cycles stimulated with either recombinant luteinizing hormone (LH) or human chorionic gonadotropin acting as an LH analogue delivered as human menopausal gonadotropins, in subjects with good or poor ovarian reserve: A retrospective analysis — Research Paper | ScholarLens