2000Journal of European IntegrationRequires access

When the going gets tough: The EU's enlargement negotiations with Poland

Lykke Friis, Anna Jarosz

Open publisher page 6 citations

Abstract

Due to its size and the problems which surround its accession, Poland is often perceived as a stumbling block for the EU's ongoing enlargement process. Drawing upon negotiation theory, this paper sets out to argue that this picture is not accurate. Although Poland is a difficult candidate, it is not likely to slow down the first wave of enlargement. This is mainly due to the fact that Poland is not equipped with a BATNA (best alternative to negotiated agreement). As a consequence, the Polish government will find itself forced into signing more or less what the EU will be offering other candidates, such as, for instance, Hungary. This very fact could, however, complicate the accession of the so‐called ‘second wavers’, as Poland will probably try to re‐negotiate its accession deal before other applicants can join.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Due to its size and the problems which surround its accession, Poland is often perceived as a stumbling block for the EU's ongoing enlargement process. Drawing upon negotiation theory, this paper sets out to argue that this picture is not accurate. Although Poland is a difficult candidate, it is not likely to slow down the first wave of enlargement. This is mainly due to the fact that Poland is not equipped with a BATNA (best alternative to negotiated agreement). As a consequence, the Polish government will find itself forced into signing more or less what the EU will be offering other candidates, such as, for instance, Hungary. This very fact could, however, complicate the accession of the so‐called ‘second wavers’, as Poland will probably try to re‐negotiate its accession deal before other applicants can join.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 6 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Due to its size and the problems which surround its accession, Poland is often perceived as a stumbling block for the EU's ongoing enlargement process. Drawing upon negotiation theory, this paper sets out to argue that this picture is not accurate. Although Poland is a difficult candidate, it is not likely to slow down the first wave of enlargement. This is mainly due to the fact that Poland is not equipped with a BATNA (best alternative to negotiated agreement). As a consequence, the Polish government will find itself forced into signing more or less what the EU will be offering other candidates, such as, for instance, Hungary. This very fact could, however, complicate the accession of the so‐called ‘second wavers’, as Poland will probably try to re‐negotiate its accession deal before other applicants can join.

Key concepts: Resizing, Negotiation, International trade, International economics, Political science, Economics, Business, European union

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
When the going gets tough: The EU's enlargement negotiations with Poland — Research Paper | ScholarLens