1978Journal for Research in Mathematics EducationRequires access

The Quality of Standardized High School Mathematics Tests

Joseph M. Petrosko

Open publisher page 2 citations

Abstract

An analysis was made of the educational and psychometric quality of standardized mathematics tests aimed at high school students. Trained raters judged most of such instruments available in the United States. Tests were categorized into four areas: general mathematics (N=322), applied mathematics (N=26), algebra (N=122), and geometry (N=52). Results showed many tests to be low in common types of validity and reliability. General mathematics had, as a rule, tests with higher ratings than did the other content areas. Several implications were drawn from the study. Researchers in mathematics education should carefully analyze all aspects of tests to find those congruent with a given research need. Test developers should make renewed efforts to enhance the technical quality and curricular relevance of their products.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

An analysis was made of the educational and psychometric quality of standardized mathematics tests aimed at high school students. Trained raters judged most of such instruments available in the United States. Tests were categorized into four areas: general mathematics (N=322), applied mathematics (N=26), algebra (N=122), and geometry (N=52). Results showed many tests to be low in common types of validity and reliability. General mathematics had, as a rule, tests with higher ratings than did the other content areas. Several implications were drawn from the study. Researchers in mathematics education should carefully analyze all aspects of tests to find those congruent with a given research need. Test developers should make renewed efforts to enhance the technical quality and curricular relevance of their products.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 2 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

An analysis was made of the educational and psychometric quality of standardized mathematics tests aimed at high school students. Trained raters judged most of such instruments available in the United States. Tests were categorized into four areas: general mathematics (N=322), applied mathematics (N=26), algebra (N=122), and geometry (N=52). Results showed many tests to be low in common types of validity and reliability. General mathematics had, as a rule, tests with higher ratings than did the other content areas. Several implications were drawn from the study. Researchers in mathematics education should carefully analyze all aspects of tests to find those congruent with a given research need. Test developers should make renewed efforts to enhance the technical quality and curricular relevance of their products.

Key concepts: Mathematics education, Test (biology), Quality (philosophy), Relevance (law), Standardized test, Reliability (semiconductor), Achievement test, Mathematics

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Quality of Standardized High School Mathematics Tests — Research Paper | ScholarLens