1995•Australian Journal of Experimental AgricultureRequires access

Comparative study of vine morphology, growth, and canopy development in cane-pruned and minimal-pruned Sultana

K. J. Sommer, PR Clingeleffer, Y. Shulman

Open publisher page 24 citations

Abstract

The seasonal development of vine canopy size and vine morphology of minimal- and cane-pruned Sultana was examined by destructive harvests during the 1982-83 growth period. Leaf canopies of minimal-pruned vines developed more quickly, grew larger, and filled sooner than those of cane-pruned vines. Minimal-pruned vines had 4 times the number of shoots and 3 times the number of nodes on current seasons's shoots at 34 days after budburst. This largely explains the more rapid canopy development and fill of minimal-pruned vines. Minimal pruning had a stunting effect on growth, resulting in shorter shoots, shorter internodes, and smaller leaves compared with cane pruning. Indirect optical measurements of the seasonal leaf canopy development of Sultana vines in the same experimental vineyard during the 1991-92 growth period confirmed the results obtained in 1982-83.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

The seasonal development of vine canopy size and vine morphology of minimal- and cane-pruned Sultana was examined by destructive harvests during the 1982-83 growth period. Leaf canopies of minimal-pruned vines developed more quickly, grew larger, and filled sooner than those of cane-pruned vines. Minimal-pruned vines had 4 times the number of shoots and 3 times the number of nodes on current seasons's shoots at 34 days after budburst. This largely explains the more rapid canopy development and fill of minimal-pruned vines. Minimal pruning had a stunting effect on growth, resulting in shorter shoots, shorter internodes, and smaller leaves compared with cane pruning. Indirect optical measurements of the seasonal leaf canopy development of Sultana vines in the same experimental vineyard during the 1991-92 growth period confirmed the results obtained in 1982-83.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 24 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

The seasonal development of vine canopy size and vine morphology of minimal- and cane-pruned Sultana was examined by destructive harvests during the 1982-83 growth period. Leaf canopies of minimal-pruned vines developed more quickly, grew larger, and filled sooner than those of cane-pruned vines. Minimal-pruned vines had 4 times the number of shoots and 3 times the number of nodes on current seasons's shoots at 34 days after budburst. This largely explains the more rapid canopy development and fill of minimal-pruned vines. Minimal pruning had a stunting effect on growth, resulting in shorter shoots, shorter internodes, and smaller leaves compared with cane pruning. Indirect optical measurements of the seasonal leaf canopy development of Sultana vines in the same experimental vineyard during the 1991-92 growth period confirmed the results obtained in 1982-83.

Key concepts: Vine, Cane, Canopy, Vineyard, Pruning, Shoot, Biology, Lateral shoot

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparative study of vine morphology, growth, and canopy development in cane-pruned and minimal-pruned Sultana — Research Paper | ScholarLens