Insights on ?selecting, evaluating, and updating prospects in direct mail marketing,? by Vithala Rao and Joel Steckel
Chaim Meyer Ehrman, Gerald M. Funk
Abstract
Chaim Meyer Ehrman, Gerald M. Funk
Abstract
In their paper “Selecting, Evaluating, and Updating Prospects in Direct Mail Marketing,” Journal of Direct Marketing, Volume 9, Number 2, 1995, Vithala Rao and Joel Steckel introduced a probability modeling tool as an aid to certain direct market marketing decisions. In this comment we extend their model to include those cases where not everyone targeted by a direct mailing appeal actually read the mailing. We suggest that in direct marketing one should not interpret a nonresponse as lack of interest. Specifically, we add a variable to their model to describe the likelihood that a potential respondent reads third-class mail. We use this extended model to show that even when personal income is assumed to be positively related to the response variable for people on the entire mailing list, the response actually observed may be negatively associated with income.
OpenAlex reports 3 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.
A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.
Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.
In their paper “Selecting, Evaluating, and Updating Prospects in Direct Mail Marketing,” Journal of Direct Marketing, Volume 9, Number 2, 1995, Vithala Rao and Joel Steckel introduced a probability modeling tool as an aid to certain direct market marketing decisions. In this comment we extend their model to include those cases where not everyone targeted by a direct mailing appeal actually read the mailing. We suggest that in direct marketing one should not interpret a nonresponse as lack of interest. Specifically, we add a variable to their model to describe the likelihood that a potential respondent reads third-class mail. We use this extended model to show that even when personal income is assumed to be positively related to the response variable for people on the entire mailing list, the response actually observed may be negatively associated with income.
Key concepts: Direct marketing, Direct mail, Respondent, Variable (mathematics), Marketing, Computer science, Class (philosophy), Variables