2007Crop ScienceRequires access

Modeling Additive × Environment and Additive × Additive × Environment Using Genetic Covariances of Relatives of Wheat Genotypes

Juan Burgueño, José Crossa, P. L. Cornelius, Richard Trethowan, Graham McLaren, Anitha Krishnamachari

Open publisher page 71 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT In self‐pollinated species, the variance–covariance matrix of breeding values of the genetic strains evaluated in multienvironment trials (MET) can be partitioned into additive effects, additive × additive effects, and their interaction with environments. The additive relationship matrix A can be used to derive the additive × additive genetic variance–covariance relationships among strains, Ã. This study shows how to separate total genetic effects into additive and additive × additive and how to model the additive × environment interaction and additive × additive × environment interaction by incorporating variance–covariance structures constructed as the Kronecker product of a factor‐analytic model across sites and the additive (A) and additive × additive relationships (Ã), between strains. Two CIMMYT international trials were used for illustration. Results show that partitioning the total genotypic effects into additive and additive × additive and their interactions with environments is useful for identifying wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) lines with high additive effects (to be used in crossing programs) as well as high overall production. Some lines and environments had high positive additive × environment interaction patterns, whereas other lines and environments showed a different additive × additive × environment interaction pattern.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

ABSTRACT In self‐pollinated species, the variance–covariance matrix of breeding values of the genetic strains evaluated in multienvironment trials (MET) can be partitioned into additive effects, additive × additive effects, and their interaction with environments. The additive relationship matrix A can be used to derive the additive × additive genetic variance–covariance relationships among strains, Ã. This study shows how to separate total genetic effects into additive and additive × additive and how to model the additive × environment interaction and additive × additive × environment interaction by incorporating variance–covariance structures constructed as the Kronecker product of a factor‐analytic model across sites and the additive (A) and additive × additive relationships (Ã), between strains. Two CIMMYT international trials were used for illustration. Results show that partitioning the total genotypic effects into additive and additive × additive and their interactions with environments is useful for identifying wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) lines with high additive effects (to be used in crossing programs) as well as high overall production. Some lines and environments had high positive additive × environment interaction patterns, whereas other lines and environments showed a different additive × additive × environment interaction pattern.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 71 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

ABSTRACT In self‐pollinated species, the variance–covariance matrix of breeding values of the genetic strains evaluated in multienvironment trials (MET) can be partitioned into additive effects, additive × additive effects, and their interaction with environments. The additive relationship matrix A can be used to derive the additive × additive genetic variance–covariance relationships among strains, Ã. This study shows how to separate total genetic effects into additive and additive × additive and how to model the additive × environment interaction and additive × additive × environment interaction by incorporating variance–covariance structures constructed as the Kronecker product of a factor‐analytic model across sites and the additive (A) and additive × additive relationships (Ã), between strains. Two CIMMYT international trials were used for illustration. Results show that partitioning the total genotypic effects into additive and additive × additive and their interactions with environments is useful for identifying wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) lines with high additive effects (to be used in crossing programs) as well as high overall production. Some lines and environments had high positive additive × environment interaction patterns, whereas other lines and environments showed a different additive × additive × environment interaction pattern.

Key concepts: Additive model, Interaction, Gene–environment interaction, Feed additive, Additive genetic effects, Biology, Generalized additive model, Main effect

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Modeling Additive × Environment and Additive × Additive × Environment Using Genetic Covariances of Relatives of Wheat Genotypes — Research Paper | ScholarLens