2003Xi'nan nongye xuebaoRequires access

Comparison of mixed linear model analysis and combining ability analysis of genetic effect of main traits in maize

Xu Minglu, Pan Guang-tang, Huo Shiping, Yan QingJiu, Zhang Xing-duan, Jian Zhang

Open publisher page 0 citations

Abstract

Fourteen maize inbred lines and forty-nine crosses mated by NC II design were used in the experiment. The genetic effects for seven characters were analyzed with mixed linear model analysis and combining ability analysis. The mixed liner model analysis indicated: as for kernel weight plant~(-1), kernel number row~(-1), 100 kernels weight, ear diameter, and filling period, thre were dominant and A-A epistatic genetic effect. As for rows/ear and growth period, three were additive and dominant and A-A epistatic genetic effect, and A-A epistatic effect was not significant. But based on additive-dominant model, combining ability analysis just revealed the additive effect and dominant effect. The differences of genetic variance components between mixed model analysis and combining ability analysis were signfiicant. It was suggested by combining ability analysis that the difference of genetic variance component in some characters was mainly caused by less estimating genotype-environment interaction, and/or by more estimating additive effect in the others. The difference of heritability in the broad sense was caused by genotype-environment interaction. The difference of heritability in the narrow sense was caused by genotype-environment interaction and/or additive effect/A-A effect estimated by the two different methods.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Fourteen maize inbred lines and forty-nine crosses mated by NC II design were used in the experiment. The genetic effects for seven characters were analyzed with mixed linear model analysis and combining ability analysis. The mixed liner model analysis indicated: as for kernel weight plant~(-1), kernel number row~(-1), 100 kernels weight, ear diameter, and filling period, thre were dominant and A-A epistatic genetic effect. As for rows/ear and growth period, three were additive and dominant and A-A epistatic genetic effect, and A-A epistatic effect was not significant. But based on additive-dominant model, combining ability analysis just revealed the additive effect and dominant effect. The differences of genetic variance components between mixed model analysis and combining ability analysis were signfiicant. It was suggested by combining ability analysis that the difference of genetic variance component in some characters was mainly caused by less estimating genotype-environment interaction, and/or by more estimating additive effect in the others. The difference of heritability in the broad sense was caused by genotype-environment interaction. The difference of heritability in the narrow sense was caused by genotype-environment interaction and/or additive effect/A-A effect estimated by the two different methods.

Why it matters

A significance statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Fourteen maize inbred lines and forty-nine crosses mated by NC II design were used in the experiment. The genetic effects for seven characters were analyzed with mixed linear model analysis and combining ability analysis. The mixed liner model analysis indicated: as for kernel weight plant~(-1), kernel number row~(-1), 100 kernels weight, ear diameter, and filling period, thre were dominant and A-A epistatic genetic effect. As for rows/ear and growth period, three were additive and dominant and A-A epistatic genetic effect, and A-A epistatic effect was not significant. But based on additive-dominant model, combining ability analysis just revealed the additive effect and dominant effect. The differences of genetic variance components between mixed model analysis and combining ability analysis were signfiicant. It was suggested by combining ability analysis that the difference of genetic variance component in some characters was mainly caused by less estimating genotype-environment interaction, and/or by more estimating additive effect in the others. The difference of heritability in the broad sense was caused by genotype-environment interaction. The difference of heritability in the narrow sense was caused by genotype-environment interaction and/or additive effect/A-A effect estimated by the two different methods.

Key concepts: Heritability, Interaction, Mixed model, Epistasis, Additive genetic effects, Main effect, Analysis of variance, Variance components

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of mixed linear model analysis and combining ability analysis of genetic effect of main traits in maize — Research Paper | ScholarLens