2009•Biomarkers in MedicineRequires access

Comparison of the Cardiac Markers B-type Natriuretic Peptide and N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide

Stefan Büchner, Carsten Gerald Jungbauer, Christoph M. Birner, Kurt Debl, Günter A.J. Riegger, Andreas Luchner

Open publisher page 13 citations

Abstract

B-type natriuretic peptide and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide have emerged as powerful biomarkers for heart failure and other cardiovascular conditions. B-type natriuretic peptide and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide are synthesized on the basis of myocardial stress and hypertrophy and are detectable in serum by several commercially available assays. Although both markers display wide similarities in their predictive values for acute and chronic heart failure, important differences exist regarding cutoff values and influence of noncardiac variables. The similarities and differences between B-type natriuretic peptide and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide will be reviewed and illustrated in detail regarding preanalytics and analytics, predictive properties for acute and chronic heart failure and prognosis as well as the influence of noncardiac parameters.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

B-type natriuretic peptide and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide have emerged as powerful biomarkers for heart failure and other cardiovascular conditions. B-type natriuretic peptide and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide are synthesized on the basis of myocardial stress and hypertrophy and are detectable in serum by several commercially available assays. Although both markers display wide similarities in their predictive values for acute and chronic heart failure, important differences exist regarding cutoff values and influence of noncardiac variables. The similarities and differences between B-type natriuretic peptide and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide will be reviewed and illustrated in detail regarding preanalytics and analytics, predictive properties for acute and chronic heart failure and prognosis as well as the influence of noncardiac parameters.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 13 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

B-type natriuretic peptide and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide have emerged as powerful biomarkers for heart failure and other cardiovascular conditions. B-type natriuretic peptide and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide are synthesized on the basis of myocardial stress and hypertrophy and are detectable in serum by several commercially available assays. Although both markers display wide similarities in their predictive values for acute and chronic heart failure, important differences exist regarding cutoff values and influence of noncardiac variables. The similarities and differences between B-type natriuretic peptide and N-terminal pro B-type natriuretic peptide will be reviewed and illustrated in detail regarding preanalytics and analytics, predictive properties for acute and chronic heart failure and prognosis as well as the influence of noncardiac parameters.

Key concepts: Natriuretic peptide, Medicine, Heart failure, Internal medicine, Peptide, NPR2, Cardiology, Endocrinology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Comparison of the Cardiac Markers B-type Natriuretic Peptide and N-terminal Pro B-type Natriuretic Peptide — Research Paper | ScholarLens