1998The Thoracic and Cardiovascular SurgeonRequires access

Diagnostic Value of Procalcitonin: the Influence of Cardiopulmonary Bypass, Aprotinin, SIRS, and Sepsis

Udo Boeken, P. Feindt, Thomas Petzold, Matthias Klein, Mario Micek, U.T. Seyfert, Ekta Mohan, H. Schulte, E Gams

Open publisher page 23 citations

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The reasons for a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) following ECC are not yet fully understood. Procalcitonin (PCT) blood levels may distinguish between bacterial infections and a non-bacterial systemic inflammation. We investigated the influence of ECC, ECC modified by application of aprotinin, systemic inflammation, and bacterial infection on the PCT values. METHODS: 20 CABG patients were randomized and divided in two groups. Group A served as the control group, while group B perioperatively received a high dose of aprotinin. Blood samples for measurement of PCT were taken 6 times perioperatively. Furthermore, blood samples were taken from 20 preoperatively comparable patients who suffered from bacterial infection (n = 10) (group C) or a SIRS (n = 10) (group D) after ECC; in these groups PCT was determined daily after the onset of inflammation. RESULTS: There was no significant elevation of PCT in group A or B at any time. In sepsis patients a significant elevation of PCT was seen, with the peak level of 18.6+/-6.3 ng/ml on the second day after diagnosis; the PCT level of SIRS patients remained constantly low (<0.9 ng/ml). CONCLUSIONS: In this study it was demonstrated that ECC and the use of aprotinin did not have any influence on the secretion of PCT. A systemic bacterial infection caused a significant increase of PCT, whereas PCT values remained normal in case of a SIRS. So it seems to be possible to distinguish between a primary SIRS and a bacterial sepsis by means of PCT.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

BACKGROUND: The reasons for a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) following ECC are not yet fully understood. Procalcitonin (PCT) blood levels may distinguish between bacterial infections and a non-bacterial systemic inflammation. We investigated the influence of ECC, ECC modified by application of aprotinin, systemic inflammation, and bacterial infection on the PCT values. METHODS: 20 CABG patients were randomized and divided in two groups. Group A served as the control group, while group B perioperatively received a high dose of aprotinin. Blood samples for measurement of PCT were taken 6 times perioperatively. Furthermore, blood samples were taken from 20 preoperatively comparable patients who suffered from bacterial infection (n = 10) (group C) or a SIRS (n = 10) (group D) after ECC; in these groups PCT was determined daily after the onset of inflammation. RESULTS: There was no significant elevation of PCT in group A or B at any time. In sepsis patients a significant elevation of PCT was seen, with the peak level of 18.6+/-6.3 ng/ml on the second day after diagnosis; the PCT level of SIRS patients remained constantly low (<0.9 ng/ml). CONCLUSIONS: In this study it was demonstrated that ECC and the use of aprotinin did not have any influence on the secretion of PCT. A systemic bacterial infection caused a significant increase of PCT, whereas PCT values remained normal in case of a SIRS. So it seems to be possible to distinguish between a primary SIRS and a bacterial sepsis by means of PCT.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 23 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

BACKGROUND: The reasons for a systemic inflammatory response syndrome (SIRS) following ECC are not yet fully understood. Procalcitonin (PCT) blood levels may distinguish between bacterial infections and a non-bacterial systemic inflammation. We investigated the influence of ECC, ECC modified by application of aprotinin, systemic inflammation, and bacterial infection on the PCT values. METHODS: 20 CABG patients were randomized and divided in two groups. Group A served as the control group, while group B perioperatively received a high dose of aprotinin. Blood samples for measurement of PCT were taken 6 times perioperatively. Furthermore, blood samples were taken from 20 preoperatively comparable patients who suffered from bacterial infection (n = 10) (group C) or a SIRS (n = 10) (group D) after ECC; in these groups PCT was determined daily after the onset of inflammation. RESULTS: There was no significant elevation of PCT in group A or B at any time. In sepsis patients a significant elevation of PCT was seen, with the peak level of 18.6+/-6.3 ng/ml on the second day after diagnosis; the PCT level of SIRS patients remained constantly low (<0.9 ng/ml). CONCLUSIONS: In this study it was demonstrated that ECC and the use of aprotinin did not have any influence on the secretion of PCT. A systemic bacterial infection caused a significant increase of PCT, whereas PCT values remained normal in case of a SIRS. So it seems to be possible to distinguish between a primary SIRS and a bacterial sepsis by means of PCT.

Key concepts: Procalcitonin, Medicine, Aprotinin, Systemic inflammatory response syndrome, Sepsis, Ulinastatin, Systemic inflammation, Gastroenterology

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
Diagnostic Value of Procalcitonin: the Influence of Cardiopulmonary Bypass, Aprotinin, SIRS, and Sepsis — Research Paper | ScholarLens