1975•Sociological Methods & ResearchRequires access

The Process of Political Development

John Deegan

Open publisher page 18 citations

Abstract

Although a number of investigators have attempted to identify empirically a process of political development, substantial controversy still surrounds a determination of the causal factors involved. It is my contention that this state of affairs is the result of inadequacies inherent in traditional techniques of causal modeling, and aggravated when multicollinear variables are involved. To resolve this problem I first review a technique capable of reducing the confounding effects of multicollinearity. I then illustrate use of this technique, as well as a strategy for inferring causal relationships, by means of a reanalysis of published data used to construct models of political development. The strategy for causal inference utilized herein is derived from knowledge of the effects of model specification errors. On the basis of these findings a new causal model of political development, which is both theoretically and empirically consistent, is presented.

About this research paper

What this paper is about

Although a number of investigators have attempted to identify empirically a process of political development, substantial controversy still surrounds a determination of the causal factors involved. It is my contention that this state of affairs is the result of inadequacies inherent in traditional techniques of causal modeling, and aggravated when multicollinear variables are involved. To resolve this problem I first review a technique capable of reducing the confounding effects of multicollinearity. I then illustrate use of this technique, as well as a strategy for inferring causal relationships, by means of a reanalysis of published data used to construct models of political development. The strategy for causal inference utilized herein is derived from knowledge of the effects of model specification errors. On the basis of these findings a new causal model of political development, which is both theoretically and empirically consistent, is presented.

Why it matters

OpenAlex reports 18 citations for this work. Citation counts describe recorded attention and do not establish research quality.

Key contribution

A contribution statement is not available in the OpenAlex record.

Method / approach

Method details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Main findings

Findings are not separately available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Limitations

Limitations are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Applications

Application details are not available in the OpenAlex metadata.

Available abstract

Although a number of investigators have attempted to identify empirically a process of political development, substantial controversy still surrounds a determination of the causal factors involved. It is my contention that this state of affairs is the result of inadequacies inherent in traditional techniques of causal modeling, and aggravated when multicollinear variables are involved. To resolve this problem I first review a technique capable of reducing the confounding effects of multicollinearity. I then illustrate use of this technique, as well as a strategy for inferring causal relationships, by means of a reanalysis of published data used to construct models of political development. The strategy for causal inference utilized herein is derived from knowledge of the effects of model specification errors. On the basis of these findings a new causal model of political development, which is both theoretically and empirically consistent, is presented.

Key concepts: Causal inference, Multicollinearity, Causal model, Causal analysis, Construct (python library), Politics, Econometrics, Inference

Related papers

Back to paper searchBrowse research topicsOriginal source
The Process of Political Development — Research Paper | ScholarLens